Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file |
| Date | 2011-10-31 13:46 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <ln39e8khyg.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <9b198cc9-d374-4a14-a100-91b74eb12d9e@a12g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <88a48804-4b47-41f8-bd12-e5b8b4c7df85@m19g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <9h6go1FcetU1@mid.individual.net> <721e72aa-54ae-4a90-997f-960266c961ff@u37g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <f01b76a8-1726-4c8a-a7e7-bee91d6e77d9@p16g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> writes:
[...]
> Note the C standard only specifies which standdard functions /must/
> set errno. It doesn't say that others can't. (pedant point: I'm sure
> there are a few library functions that must not set errno).
[...]
Actually, I don't think there are any.
C99 7.5p3:
The value of errno is zero at program startup, but is never set
to zero by any library function. The value of errno may be set
to nonzero by a library function call whether or not there is
an error, provided the use of errno is not documented in the
description of the function in this International Standard.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
no error by fscanf on reading from output file "V.Subramanian, India" <subramanian100in@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-29 23:59 -0700
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-30 20:19 +1300
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2011-10-30 08:18 +0000
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-30 21:23 +1300
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-30 08:11 -0400
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-31 07:38 +1300
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-10-30 19:40 +0000
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-31 08:50 +1300
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file "V.Subramanian, India" <subramanian100in@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-30 00:01 -0700
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2011-10-30 08:39 +0000
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Carlo Dapor <catull@gmail.com> - 2011-10-30 19:16 -0700
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-31 15:50 +1300
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file "V.Subramanian, India" <subramanian100in@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-30 22:55 -0700
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2011-10-31 07:14 +0000
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-31 20:56 +1300
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-10-31 15:43 +0000
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-31 01:35 -0700
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-10-31 13:46 -0700
Re: no error by fscanf on reading from output file Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2011-10-31 07:02 +0000
csiph-web