Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #30892

Re: Are Computer able to think?

From HaveANiceDay <HaveANiceDay@NoSpam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Are Computer able to think?
Date 2014-05-28 16:54 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <lm4tbl$ger$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <7407f668-e6b6-4176-bb9f-af9695fc75b4@googlegroups.com> <7z4n0dzrld.fsf@example.com> <lltaap$fbo$1@news.albasani.net> <op.xgfm98sr6zenlw@localhost>

Show all headers | View raw

"Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> wrote:

> On Sun, 25 May 2014 13:47:04 -0400, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> 
> > We are not algorithm.
> 
> DNA would say otherwise.

How could a library (that's what DNA is, AFAIK, NOT an OS) tell you what you are?

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Are Computer able to think? David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-25 18:38 +0100
  Re: Are Computer able to think? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-05-25 19:47 +0200
    Re: Are Computer able to think? David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-25 19:19 +0100
      Re: Are Computer able to think? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-25 20:50 +0200
        Re: Are Computer able to think? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-05-26 18:50 +0100
          Re: Are Computer able to think? David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-26 20:42 +0100
    Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-25 16:31 -0400
      Re: Are Computer able to think? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-25 22:36 +0200
      Re: Are Computer able to think? HaveANiceDay <HaveANiceDay@NoSpam.invalid> - 2014-05-28 16:54 +0200
  Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-25 16:36 -0400

csiph-web