Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? |
| Date | 2014-05-28 10:02 +0000 |
| Organization | My Linux Box |
| Message-ID | <lm4c71$g7o$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <86edncYTnbtS2RzOnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lls57i$ef3$1@dont-email.me> <budlfvFdpuvU1@mid.individual.net> <llsu37$u2v$4@dont-email.me> <bulaa5F2cq8U1@mid.individual.net> |
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: > On 26/05/2014 12:18 AM, Rich wrote: > > Time pressure may be a big influence. It is also easy to do a plain > > text password: > > > > select 1 from users where id = 'joe' and password = 'frank'; > > > > Granted, one should use parameters rather than sql injection ready > > code, but the above is easy to code, esp. while the system is still > > running on the developers workstation only. And it works, or at least > > appears to work, from the point of view of the testing folks. So no > > one notices. > Perhaps we should just remove literals from SQL altogether. Yes, there > are many places where a literal makes sense, but since programmers > cannot be trusted to use them safely, let's rip them out. Programmers > will have to learn how to use parameters. Some would probably be > surprised to learn that parameters even exist. We'd save ourselves the sql-injection possibilities that way. We'd lose the ability to hand type an SQL query at a prompt. But that change would do nothing to prevent bad password storage implementations.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is computer security culture simply broken? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-24 20:11 +0000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2014-05-24 18:17 -0700
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Randy Westlund <Vorzakir@invalid.invalid> - 2014-05-25 07:13 +0000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-25 17:47 +1000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-25 09:10 +0000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-25 19:23 +1000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-25 12:33 +0100
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-25 14:18 +0000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2014-05-28 01:43 -0300
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-28 08:07 +0000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-28 15:25 +1000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-28 10:02 +0000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-28 20:21 +1000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-28 18:11 +0000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-29 10:39 +0000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-25 14:12 +0000
Re: Is computer security culture simply broken? Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-31 10:05 +0200
csiph-web