Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Ebay hacked |
| Date | 2014-05-25 14:00 +0000 |
| Organization | My Linux Box |
| Message-ID | <llst29$u2v$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <bu5nskFnom7U1@mid.individual.net> <slrnlns7m5.scb.g.kreme@amelia.local> <vg3oayn5gh3.fsf@coffee.modeemi.fi> <llqipl$59h$1@dont-email.me> <budrskFf0vtU2@mid.individual.net> |
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: > On 25/05/2014 2:53 AM, Rich wrote: > > > > "Spaces and certain symbols (< >[ ]//) are not allowed in password." > > > > A properly designed password storage (using a hashing function such as > > bcrypt or scrypt) does not care what symbols are in the password. > > > > Caring about specific symbols in the password implies they are not > > following proper password storage models. > > > I wonder where the restriction is enforced - both on the client and at > the server, or just in the client? How many here would be surprised if > it were the latter? Before I looked, I was going to predict it was enforced client side. But, what they have in the javascript of the change page is a client side test for at least one of each of the different character classes they want someone to use, and adjustment of their silly "strength" meter. But the actual "these characters are not allowed" appears to be happening server side. Their password strength meter is also silly. As long as you have one upper case, one lower case, one numeral, and one symbol (from their list of "allowed" symbols), and are over five characters, they show the password as strong. So their strength meeter shows this as "strong" aaa!1A Note, not a real password....
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-22 17:38 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-22 13:35 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2014-05-24 14:32 +0100
Re: Ebay hacked Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-22 15:59 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-05-23 17:06 +0300
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-24 16:13 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-24 20:45 +0100
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-25 19:33 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2014-05-25 20:19 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-25 21:50 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-24 16:53 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-05-24 21:12 +0300
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-24 18:33 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-25 19:37 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-25 13:46 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-26 16:55 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-26 18:42 +0200
Re: Ebay hacked Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-27 13:38 +0200
Re: Ebay hacked Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-24 22:32 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-25 19:36 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-25 14:00 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-25 17:18 +0200
Re: Ebay hacked Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-25 22:53 +0200
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-26 17:03 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-26 13:17 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-27 15:18 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-26 06:57 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-26 17:07 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-26 13:21 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-27 05:53 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-26 13:19 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-26 18:46 +0200
Re: Ebay hacked "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-24 20:54 +0100
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-24 20:24 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-24 22:35 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-23 00:28 +0100
Re: Ebay hacked simple@machines.gopher - 2014-05-23 14:30 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-24 00:36 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-24 13:34 +0200
Re: Ebay hacked mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-05-23 18:21 +0100
Re: Ebay hacked Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-23 18:39 +0100
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-24 16:29 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-23 21:57 +0000
Re: Ebay hacked Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-05-24 16:28 +1000
Re: Ebay hacked "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-26 15:27 +0100
Re: Ebay hacked Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-05-26 14:32 +0000
csiph-web