Dragonfly BSD less CPU-intensive for networking traffic. Why?

From	RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>
Newsgroups	comp.misc
Subject	Dragonfly BSD less CPU-intensive for networking traffic. Why?
Date	2014-05-12 12:10 +0000
Organization	solani.org
Message-ID	<lkqdn4$ncb$1@solani.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

From the «flaps its wings harder» department:
Title: DragonFly network performance
Author: justin sherrill
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 22:11:29 -0400
Link: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AboutBSD/~3/vRjJMTiVahE/13924.html

Wojciech Puchar noted with some surprise[1] that DragonFly uses less CPU than
expected for high-packet-rate traffic.  This has been going on for a while[2]
, and apparently Sepherosa Ziehau has even more[3]improvements[4] planned.
[image 6][5][image 8][7][image 10][9][image 12][11][image 14][13][image 16][15][image 18][17][image 19]

Links:
[1]: http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/128431.html (link)
[2]: http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/128436.html (link)
[3]: http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/128440.html (link)
[4]: http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/128441.html (link)
[5]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?a=vRjJMTiVahE:fEcfNT7CXwo:yIl2AUoC8zA (link)
[6]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?d=yIl2AUoC8zA (image)
[7]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?a=vRjJMTiVahE:fEcfNT7CXwo:7Q72WNTAKBA (link)
[8]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?d=7Q72WNTAKBA (image)
[9]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?a=vRjJMTiVahE:fEcfNT7CXwo:V_sGLiPBpWU (link)
[10]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?i=vRjJMTiVahE:fEcfNT7CXwo:V_sGLiPBpWU (image)
[11]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?a=vRjJMTiVahE:fEcfNT7CXwo:qj6IDK7rITs (link)
[12]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?d=qj6IDK7rITs (image)
[13]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?a=vRjJMTiVahE:fEcfNT7CXwo:l6gmwiTKsz0 (link)
[14]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?d=l6gmwiTKsz0 (image)
[15]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?a=vRjJMTiVahE:fEcfNT7CXwo:gIN9vFwOqvQ (link)
[16]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?i=vRjJMTiVahE:fEcfNT7CXwo:gIN9vFwOqvQ (image)
[17]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?a=vRjJMTiVahE:fEcfNT7CXwo:TzevzKxY174 (link)
[18]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AboutBSD?d=TzevzKxY174 (image)
[19]: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AboutBSD/~4/vRjJMTiVahE (image)

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Dragonfly BSD less CPU-intensive for networking traffic.  Why? RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-12 12:10 +0000

csiph-web