Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242768

Re: Number of desktop users, by distro

From DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Number of desktop users, by distro
Date 2014-05-09 10:26 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <lkiojb$blf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <lkdeng$fho$2@dont-email.me> <9bcf7f53-4564-426d-aa80-d1700cb5753e@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 5/9/2014 8:15 AM, -hh wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 10:07:45 AM UTC-4, DFS wrote:
>>
>> http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportOperatingSystems.htm
>>
>
>> Table Breakdown per platform for Mac and Linux
>> removed Mac and Linux Android
>> ...
>
> I looked first at the largest context before drilling down:
>
>
>
> In order of popularity
>
>
>
> Operating System   Requests     Percentage
>
> Windows            100,482 M    43.44%
> iPhone              55,191 M    23.86%
> Linux               28,571 M    12.35%
> iPad                23,274 M    10.06%
> Mac                 13,079 M     5.65%
> BlackBerry             891 M     0.38%
>
> (subtotal:         221,480 M    95.74%)



It seems nearly impossible for iPhone users to show more than 50% as 
many page requests as Windows users.  I trust they're reporting the data 
correctly, but this is too strange.  And I see they're not counting 
Windows 8.x (or maybe they are but forgot to update the comments).



> SymbianOS             70.8 M     0.03%
> FreeBSD               30.6 M     0.01%
> DoCoMo                13.1 M     0.01%
> SunOS                  6.2 M     0.00%
> OpenBSD                0.839 M   0.00%
>
> Total            231,332 M      100%
>
>
> Where the above gets slightly misleading is that
> the "12.3% Linux" includes Andriod.  Seeking to
> separate that out is what DFS's table is; in
> slightly broader contextual form:
>
>
> Linux Android       25,486 M    11.02%
> Mac Intel           12,994 M     5.62%
> Linux Other          1,926 M     0.83%
> Linux Ubuntu         1,118 M     0.48%
> Mac PowerPC             83.6 M   0.04%
> Linux Fedora             9.6 M   0.00%
> Linux Mint               9 M     0.00%
> Linux SUSE               8.2 M   0.00%
> Linux Debian             4.9 M   0.00%
> Linux Mandriva           3.6 M   0.00%
> Linux Mips               1.6 M   0.00%
> Linux Red Hat            1.4 M   0.00%
> Linux Kubuntu            0.955 M 0.00%
> Linux CentOS             0.954 M 0.00%
> etc.
>
>
> Taking the above and subtracting these two lines:
>
> Linux               28,571 M    12.35%
> minus
> Linux Android       25,486 M    11.02%
> ----------------------------------------
> (Linux Desktop)      3,085 M     1.33%
>
>
> Which can be cross-checked by summing its constitutent pieces:
>
> Linux Other          1,926 M     0.83%
> Linux Ubuntu         1,118 M     0.48%
> Linux Fedora             9.6 M   0.00%
> Linux Mint               9 M     0.00%
> Linux SUSE               8.2 M   0.00%
> Linux Debian             4.9 M   0.00%
> Linux Mandriva           3.6 M   0.00%
> Linux Mips               1.6 M   0.00%
> Linux Red Hat            1.4 M   0.00%
> Linux Kubuntu            0.955 M 0.00%
> Linux CentOS             0.954 M 0.00%
> Linux Mandriva           3.6 M   0.00%
> Linux Mips               1.6 M   0.00%
> Linux Red Hat            1.4 M   0.00%
> Linux Kubuntu            0.955 M 0.00%
> Linux CentOS             0.954 M 0.00%
> -----------------------------------------
>                 sum:   3084.209 M
>
> Note:  99.97% accounted; the balance is
> obviously the ignored "etc" & rounding.
>
>
> The net sum conclusion from this analysis
> is that the high level breakdown of Wiki
> accessors by OS is:
>
>   43.4% - Windows
>   33.9% - iOS
>   11.0% - Android
>    5.7% - Mac OS
>    1.3% - Linux (desktop)
>    0.4% - Blackberry OS
> ------------------------
>   95.7%  (vs 95.74 in above subtotal; remaining
>           balance is 'etc' & rounding errors)


Nice analysis.

How did you get your columns to stay aligned?  Mine are aligned when I 
submit the post, but when I read it from the group they're out of whack.



Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Number of desktop users, by distro DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-07 10:07 -0400
  Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 19:00 +0200
    Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-07 20:07 +0200
      Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-05-07 14:11 -0400
        Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-07 13:27 -0500
      Re: Number of desktop users, by distro chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-07 13:23 -0500
        Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-05-07 13:30 -0500
        Re: Number of desktop users, by distro GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-07 12:58 -0600
        Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 13:12 -0700
      Re: Number of desktop users, by distro tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-08 01:47 +0200
        Re: Number of desktop users, by distro RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 00:04 +0000
          Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 17:58 -0700
            Re: Number of desktop users, by distro "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 13:59 -0700
              Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 14:13 -0700
        Re: Number of desktop users, by distro "Hans Blafhoed" <marti.takes.it.up.the.shitter@nospam.eu> - 2014-05-08 22:12 +0200
          Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 22:44 +0200
      Re: Number of desktop users, by distro RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 23:49 +0000
        Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-07 16:53 -0700
          Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 16:57 -0700
            Re: Number of desktop users, by distro "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 14:02 -0700
              Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-08 14:12 -0700
              Re: Number of desktop users, by distro 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:14 -0400
                Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-09 07:51 -0700
        Re: Number of desktop users, by distro DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-08 23:26 -0400
          Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:33 +0200
            Re: Number of desktop users, by distro 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-09 07:39 -0400
              Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-09 08:16 -0700
  Re: Number of desktop users, by distro -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-09 05:15 -0700
    Re: Number of desktop users, by distro DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-05-09 10:26 -0400
      Re: Number of desktop users, by distro -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-05-09 07:51 -0700
        Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:29 -0700
          Re: Number of desktop users, by distro Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-09 10:45 -0700

csiph-web