Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Secure comms over ham radio? |
| Date | 2014-05-06 03:18 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lkacud$in7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <lk107n$ho4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1977867408420757245.386847bob_davis_retired-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <lk6bnr$252$4@solani.org> <lk92ur$gqr$1@dont-email.me> <lka0p3$aae$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On 2014-05-06 06:51:17 +0000, Hils said: > On 2014-05-05 23:22, Oregonian Haruspex wrote: >> On 2014-05-04 21:33:48 +0000, RS Wood said: >>> Looking at the article, it seems they know it's illegal, but if you're a >>> dissident in - say - Syria, that's the least of your problems if you >>> need to get a message out. Something like that. > > Syria may be a poor example. Many of the genuine "dissidents" in Syria > have aligned themselves with Assad because the "dissidents" which the > US, UK and Saudi Arabia have been sponsoring are a mix of > fundamantalists, butchers and cannibals. > >> Seems like there are better ways to come up with secure communications >> using already existing and compatible modes. CW and one time pads are >> still the best after all these years. > > That method relies on individuals learning CW. Today's revolutionaries > could be encouraged by an alternative more along the lines outlined. The poor, poor folks who can't even be bothered to learn CW. I hate to say it but if they can't do that, what can they do? It's not easy but if they are serious they can practically learn to fly.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Secure comms over ham radio? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-02 20:17 +0000
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? john <nospam@no.net> - 2014-05-02 12:46 -0800
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 21:02 +0000
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-03 08:02 +0100
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-05 15:22 -0700
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-06 07:51 +0100
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 03:18 -0700
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-06 11:51 +0100
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-05-06 16:09 +0100
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 21:49 +0000
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> - 2014-05-08 16:12 +0200
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-06 16:43 +0000
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-06 18:00 +0100
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Randy Westlund <Vorzakir@invalid.invalid> - 2014-05-06 17:02 +0000
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-06 18:41 +0000
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? john <nospam@no.net> - 2014-05-07 14:09 -0800
Re: Secure comms over ham radio? john <nospam@no.net> - 2014-05-07 14:08 -0800
csiph-web