Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #2644

Re: Secure comms over ham radio?

From Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: Secure comms over ham radio?
Date 2014-05-06 03:18 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <lkacud$in7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <lk107n$ho4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1977867408420757245.386847bob_davis_retired-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <lk6bnr$252$4@solani.org> <lk92ur$gqr$1@dont-email.me> <lka0p3$aae$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2014-05-06 06:51:17 +0000, Hils said:

> On 2014-05-05 23:22, Oregonian Haruspex wrote:
>> On 2014-05-04 21:33:48 +0000, RS Wood said:
>>> Looking at the article, it seems they know it's illegal, but if you're a
>>> dissident in - say - Syria, that's the least of your problems if you
>>> need to get a message out.  Something like that.
> 
> Syria may be a poor example. Many of the genuine "dissidents" in Syria
> have aligned themselves with Assad because the "dissidents" which the
> US, UK and Saudi Arabia have been sponsoring are a mix of
> fundamantalists, butchers and cannibals.
> 
>> Seems like there are better ways to come up with secure communications
>> using already existing and compatible modes.  CW and one time pads are
>> still the best after all these years.
> 
> That method relies on individuals learning CW. Today's revolutionaries
> could be encouraged by an alternative more along the lines outlined.

The poor, poor folks who can't even be bothered to learn CW.  I hate to 
say it but if they can't do that, what can they do?

It's not easy but if they are serious they can practically learn to fly.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Secure comms over ham radio? RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-02 20:17 +0000
  Re: Secure comms over ham radio? john <nospam@no.net> - 2014-05-02 12:46 -0800
    Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-02 21:02 +0000
      Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-03 08:02 +0100
      Re: Secure comms over ham radio? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-04 21:33 +0000
        Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-05 15:22 -0700
          Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-06 07:51 +0100
            Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 03:18 -0700
              Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-06 11:51 +0100
                Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2014-05-06 16:09 +0100
                Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-06 21:49 +0000
                Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> - 2014-05-08 16:12 +0200
                Re: Secure comms over ham radio? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-06 16:43 +0000
                Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-06 18:00 +0100
                Re: Secure comms over ham radio? Randy Westlund <Vorzakir@invalid.invalid> - 2014-05-06 17:02 +0000
                Re: Secure comms over ham radio? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-06 18:41 +0000
      Re: Secure comms over ham radio? john <nospam@no.net> - 2014-05-07 14:09 -0800
    Re: Secure comms over ham radio? john <nospam@no.net> - 2014-05-07 14:08 -0800

csiph-web