Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #240842
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: This years Coverity scan |
| Date | 2014-04-29 19:50 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ljpdt2$i3d$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ljh98o$tra$1@dont-email.me> <ljmoa9$9qv$1@dont-email.me> <ljmp0r$df7$1@dont-email.me> <ljmqis$fi0$6@dont-email.me> |
On 4/28/2014 8:09 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> DFS wrote: >> >>> Coverity's code is closed source. >>> So is yours. >>> And Creepy's. And >>> SMelzzzzz's. And every developer's here on cola. >> >> That has still nothing to do with OSS im general > > Our code belongs to the customer. They get the source, they do as they will > with it. > > I would prefer they post it, as it was paid for with government funds. I wish so, too. Then we could see your weenie code. Well, we could see your weenie code if you actually wrote production code. > However, it is so purpose specific that only a bit of it would be of > interest to the general public. > > Doofus, as usual, is confused. Liking and espousing OSS does not mean that > you have to work for an "open-source" outfit. > > Not in the least. Never said you had to. > And, if you want to be picky, the code that is "mine" is indeed open-source, > or soon will be. > > I wonder if the clown understands MiB vs MB yet, or that various entities > play fast-and-loose with megabyte units. Various open source entities, you mean. I've never once seen such bullshit in MS products. > He should try "du" vice "du -h", and "du -m". 'du' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
This years Coverity scan Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-26 23:42 +0200
Re: This years Coverity scan Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 17:24 -0700
Re: This years Coverity scan GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-26 19:32 -0600
Re: This years Coverity scan Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 19:06 -0700
Errors per line of code ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-26 19:23 -0700
Re: Errors per line of code ? ! Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-04-26 20:25 -0700
@snit should publish his monthly rate. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-26 21:34 -0700
Re: @snit should publish his monthly rate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 21:40 -0700
@snit should publish his monthly rate. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-26 22:27 -0700
Re: @snit should publish his monthly rate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-26 23:16 -0700
@snit is bat·shit crazy. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-04-27 00:51 -0700
Re: @snit is bat·shit crazy. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 09:20 -0700
Re: @snit should publish his monthly rate. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-04-27 11:09 -0700
Re: This years Coverity scan Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 11:00 -0400
Re: This years Coverity scan flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-27 11:38 -0400
Re: This years Coverity scan Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 12:41 -0400
Re: This years Coverity scan GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-27 11:20 -0600
Re: This years Coverity scan Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-27 15:13 -0400
Re: This years Coverity scan Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-27 09:31 -0700
Re: This years Coverity scan DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-28 19:30 -0400
Re: This years Coverity scan Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-29 01:42 +0200
Re: This years Coverity scan Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-28 20:09 -0400
Re: This years Coverity scan DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-29 19:50 -0400
Re: This years Coverity scan William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-04-29 09:18 +0100
Re: This years Coverity scan chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-29 07:00 -0500
Re: This years Coverity scan flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-29 08:13 -0400
Re: This years Coverity scan Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-29 14:32 +0200
csiph-web