Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | dialmove <dialmove@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? |
| Date | 2014-02-20 16:36 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <le5aum$1c4$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <le0u4o$eup$1@dont-email.me> <le59r0$1c4$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:17:36 +0000, dialmove wrote: > The Functional Reactive paradigm provides better abstractions for > concurrency than imperative code - futures, promises and observables are > at a way higher level than locks and semaphores, and in many cases allow > writing complex asynchronous code in a pure functional way. For the rest > of cases, you can add explicit state and transform it into an > agent-based model, which is essentially OOP parallelism done right. > > So yes, I think a high-level paradigm that simplifies synchronization > can make complex parallel tasks easier to program and reason about. I've > seen some examples in action, of which Espresso Logic is an awesome > case. ...aaaaand, this writer at the old site explains it way more eloquently that I ever could: http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4527735&cid=45625371
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-18 16:33 -0800
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? dialmove <dialmove@gmail.com> - 2014-02-20 16:17 +0000
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? dialmove <dialmove@gmail.com> - 2014-02-20 16:36 +0000
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-20 20:09 +0200
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-20 13:05 -0800
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-20 23:18 +0200
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? wjwlsn <ibillwilson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-20 13:40 -0800
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? dialmove <dialmove@gmail.com> - 2014-02-21 13:56 +0000
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? dialmove <dialmove@gmail.com> - 2014-02-21 13:34 +0000
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-21 16:57 +0200
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? dialmove <dialmove@gmail.com> - 2014-02-21 15:49 +0000
Re: Can Reactive Programming Handle Complexity? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-21 18:22 +0200
csiph-web