Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #356

Re: olympics - coat hanger hack

From Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: olympics - coat hanger hack
Date 2014-02-12 22:51 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ldhq1e$kf8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <ldb6il$kfj$1@dont-email.me> <87iosm4v3v.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <ldbcld$vv9$1@dont-email.me> <a27e0690-ef34-4192-a1aa-2bfe2583efa7@googlegroups.com> <lddku2$7su$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2014-02-11 16:59:27 +0000, Atom Cogswell said:

> On 2/10/2014 6:25 PM, deepmagicbeginshere@gmail.com wrote:
> That works great if you're within range of the broadcast. A lot of
> people are. With the push to digital TV, with its shorter range, a lot
> of people still are not. I live in a metropolitan area, and I know the
> location of the transmitters. One is only about six miles away, and my
> TV reception from that tower is incredibly poor, to the point of being
> unwatchable sometimes. I think they play with the power.
> 
> In the old days one might have to put up with static, but digital can't
> hack it with a poor signal. More stuttering than a room full of
> Tourettes syndrome sufferers.
> 
> The other consideration is that NBC's mainline non-cable coverage of the
> events is terrible, limited in scope.

I hate digital TV, but not just for the reason you state.  We have a 
remote property in Minnesota where before the digital days, it was 
possible to pull in (with considerable static) three stations.  Now we 
get one.

However, one of the biggest reasons I hate digital TV is that a minor 
signal loss event causes the video and audio to halt completely or at 
least break up into stuttering nonsense, and re-synch takes a few 
seconds or so.  During weather events or just marginal signal days 
thanks to low UHF / VHF propagation the TV is essentially unwatchable.  
Another issue is that, especially with sports, panning shots tend to 
destroy fine detail.  Nothing like watching a couple soccer players run 
down the field which turns into an ugly pixellated smear.

I suppose it's for the best, because TV rots your brain as we both know.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The $4.38 billion reason it’s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 14:55 -0800
  Re: The $4.38 billion reason it’s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-08 20:08 +0000
    Re: The $4.38 billion reason it’s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-08 16:28 -0500
      Re: The $4.38 billion reason it¹s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-09 15:18 +0000
  Re: The $4.38 billion reason it’s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-08 23:24 +0200
  Re: The $4.38 billion reason it?s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-08 14:50 -0800
    Re: The $4.38 billion reason it?s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-09 02:13 +0200
      Re: The $4.38 billion reason it?s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-08 18:38 -0800
    Re: The $4.38 billion reason it?s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-09 09:34 -0500
  Re: The $4.38 billion reason it’s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online Atom Cogswell <m8r-uu8mmb@mailinator.com> - 2014-02-10 11:42 -0700
    Re: The $4.38 billion reason it’s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-02-10 21:37 +0200
      Re: The $4.38 billion reason it’s so hard for U.S. cord-cutters to watch the Olympics online Atom Cogswell <m8r-uu8mmb@mailinator.com> - 2014-02-10 13:25 -0700
        olympics - coat hanger hack deepmagicbeginshere@gmail.com - 2014-02-10 17:25 -0800
          Re: olympics - coat hanger hack Atom Cogswell <m8r-uu8mmb@mailinator.com> - 2014-02-11 09:59 -0700
            Re: olympics - coat hanger hack RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-11 17:50 +0000
              Re: olympics - coat hanger hack 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-11 12:57 -0500
            Re: olympics - coat hanger hack Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-12 22:51 -0800
            Re: olympics - coat hanger hack Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-26 00:28 -0500

csiph-web