Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks |
| Date | 2014-02-07 16:36 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ld3u68$2nc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <52f51f6b$0$2943$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <52f5357c$0$29668$862e30e2@ngroups.net> <ld3olj$f0$1@dont-email.me> <ld3pk6$bfv$1@dont-email.me> <52f57685$0$29735$862e30e2@ngroups.net> |
On 2014-02-08 00:12:53 +0000, RS Wood said: > On 2014-02-07, 2phar <none@example.com> wrote: >> On 2/7/2014 6:02 PM, Oregonian Haruspex wrote: >> "Slashdot Media was acquired to provide content and services that are >> important to technology professionals in their everyday work lives and >> to leverage that reach into the global technology community benefiting >> user engagement on the Dice.com site. The expected benefits have >> started to be realized at Dice.com. However, advertising revenue has >> declined over the past year and there is no improvement expected in the >> future financial performance of Slashdot Media's underlying advertising >> business. Therefore, $7.2 million of intangible assets and $6.3 million >> of goodwill related to Slashdot Media were reduced to zero." >> >> Can't see they're going put much/any effort into keeping the existing >> users happy. More likely yhey might end up selling the existing database >> of users and discussions to facebook or something to be retrospectively >> mined for marketing. >> >> > > So they bought a lemon, are trying to squeeze a few drops out of it, and > they have nothing to lose since they're already not making any money. > > Glad I'm not there to see the train wreck, though I do hope we put > together something equal as a community. It really was a great place > for commentary and I learned a lot there. Still do. Usenet has the potential to be much better than any of the web 2.0 type shit that people seem to favor now. Sometimes you don't want promoted links and 'share this' all over everything - just a few good comments and the ability to blow away the assholes. I will miss Slashdot as well. I don't think I will post there any more except to draw attention to Usenet and seeing as how my account has been given the Slashdot Death Penalty I can't forsee many people seeing those comments anyway.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Slashdot Beta Sucks John Brownalt <deconfliction@filteredperception.org> - 2014-02-07 10:45 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-07 11:45 -0500
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2014-02-07 18:01 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-07 19:35 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 15:02 -0800
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-07 18:18 -0500
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-08 00:12 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 16:36 -0800
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt@nospam.demon.nl> - 2014-02-18 22:56 +0100
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 16:33 -0800
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> - 2014-02-09 03:23 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks CoolHand <coolhnd28@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 21:29 -0500
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-08 02:48 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks CoolHand <coolhnd28@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 21:54 -0500
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-08 04:09 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 22:39 -0800
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2014-02-08 12:09 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks brendan.halpin@ul.ie (Brendan Halpin) - 2014-02-19 23:24 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-07 23:15 -0500
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-07 22:41 -0800
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-02-08 20:03 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks 2phar <none@example.com> - 2014-02-08 15:16 -0500
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-08 15:31 -0800
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks shvelven <shvelven@gmail.com> - 2014-02-09 02:30 -0500
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-09 10:53 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks TrueSatan <true_satan@fastmail.co.uk> - 2014-02-09 10:54 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-09 15:35 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Vince Mulhollon <vincemulhollon@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 13:32 -0800
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks John Brownalt <deconfliction@filteredperception.org> - 2014-02-12 00:06 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks vehka <heikki.wilenius@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 17:55 -0800
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-02-12 08:47 +0847
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-26 00:34 -0500
Re: Slashdot Beta Sucks Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-02-25 23:43 -0500
Re: Slashdot Beta -> Technical reasons? "q.kontinuum" <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-11 09:05 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta -> Technical reasons? John Brownalt <deconfliction@filteredperception.org> - 2014-02-11 12:11 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta -> Technical reasons? "q.kontinuum" <achsis_of_elvis@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-11 13:26 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta -> Technical reasons? Lance Orner <lance@orner.invalid.net> - 2014-02-12 03:38 +0000
Re: Slashdot Beta -> Technical reasons? Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 09:58 -0500
csiph-web