Re: Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK

From	Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK
Date	2016-08-24 08:06 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<lb3rrbh7fejhvsru758s3rb8rs1chtmsn2@4ax.com> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <1e83e17f-15bf-4d2b-89c6-3394bba4b334@googlegroups.com> <4cac6b99-06b3-474d-91b2-475f136e04f6@googlegroups.com> <b64fe8ae-0bdf-4cc1-8cb4-1e6536b69fc1@googlegroups.com> <tbjqrblpugf4mvl9v7s879qo9kpdbkfe31@4ax.com> <33175294-455a-412d-8c81-08ba78debf9f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 01:49:24 -0700 (PDT), Archimedes Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 2:44:09 AM UTC-5, Michael Strickland wrote:
>
>> 
>> There are many possibilities for blue shifts. Some galaxies are part
>> of clusters that are rotating and if the tangential part (relative to
>> cluster center) of their velocity exceeds the overall recession
>> velocity of the cluster, they will actually be approaching us and
>> provide a blue Doppler shift. The cluster itself could also be
>> expanding or contracting which gives another term to their radial
>> (relative to us) velocity component (earth approach velocity).
>> 
>> I would expect most distant galaxies near the edge (receding at v
>> close to c) to have recession velocities much greater than their
>> cluster rotation velocities so there should be fewer blue shifts as we
>> examine more distant galaxies. However, since these galaxies are 10-15
>> billion years in the past, they may be compact and dense and thus
>> rotating faster than nearer/newer ones so there still might be some
>> blue shifts near "the edge."
>> 
>
>Why did Hubble reject Doppler effect on Light, later in his life. You would think the discoverer of astronomy redshift would make him a fan of Doppler effect always.

Do you have a cite for Hubble rejecting Doppler effect on light or are
you just asserting that he did?

---------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Strickland			Reston, VA
---------------------------------------------------

Thread

TALK: Maxwell Equations from Pair Production&Annihilation; but now, from transverse vs. longitudinal waves?? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 02:06 -0700
  electron=longitudinal wave carrying a transverse wave inside itself; Unifying Atomic physics with Maxwell Equations Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 10:27 -0700
    electron=longitudinal wave carrying a transverse wave inside itself; Unifying Atomic physics with Maxwell Equations Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 12:11 -0700
      photon function is to carry magnetism of electromagnetism and neutrino carries the electro part Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 15:30 -0700
        photon function is to carry magnetism of electromagnetism and neutrino carries the electro part Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 16:42 -0700
          Neutrino as messenger carriers is responsible for Superconductivity Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 23:31 -0700
          how Maxwell New Equations explains the Physics Particle Zoo Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 14:16 -0700
            how Maxwell New Equations explains the Physics Particle Zoo Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 16:29 -0700
            explaining why electric current moves on the surface of conductor Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 20:12 -0700
              Law of Magnetism is div*B = r_B not div*B = 0 Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 21:48 -0700
                magnetism is photon or neutrino; electricity is photon inside a neutrino Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 23:08 -0700
                magnetism is photon or neutrino; electricity is photon inside a neutrino Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 23:58 -0700
                straightline motion in physics-- does it exist? Re: magnetism is photon or neutrino; electricity is photon inside a neutrino Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 14:11 -0700
                Rule of 200 for rest-mass in physics Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 15:05 -0700
                Rule of 200 for rest-mass in physics Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 18:15 -0700
                new Experiment-- shoot a stream of gamma photons into stream of neutrinos  Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 21:59 -0700
                Negative Ion Anomaly of hydrogen in photosphere Re: new Experiment-- shoot a stream of gamma photons into neutrino beam Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 00:57 -0700
                when neutrino tubes are open and when closed torus tube Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 15:44 -0700
                settling what happens in Pair Production Re: when neutrino tubes are open and when closed torus tube Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 20:16 -0700
                Astronomy evidence that a electron is a photon inside a neutrino torus tube-- Hydrogen ions on Sun; excess positrons Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 00:26 -0700
                neutrinos and photons is the same as talking about electricity and magnetism Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 14:30 -0700
                excess of electrons & positrons in supernova, due to neutrino tubes with photon inside Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 01:53 -0700
                why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 11:03 -0700
                Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 13:34 -0500
                many in sci.physics that do not belong Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 12:48 -0700
                Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-23 18:05 -0400
                Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 07:26 -0500
                Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-24 16:31 -0400
                Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 15:59 -0500
                Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-24 03:44 -0400
                Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 01:49 -0700
                Re: Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-24 08:06 -0400
                a poster in sci.physics that never knew Hubble rejected Doppler redshift Re: TALK Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:29 -0700
                Re: a poster in sci.physics that never knew Hubble rejected Doppler redshift Re: TALK Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-25 02:10 -0400
                Re: a poster in sci.physics that never knew Hubble rejected Doppler redshift Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-26 06:16 +0200
                Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-24 15:39 -0500
                Re: Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-25 01:22 -0400
                Re: why no astronomer and physicist talks about blueshift amount Re: TALK Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-25 06:26 +0200

csiph-web