Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #53770

Re: dmg; SuperDuper vs Disk Utility

Show all headers | View raw

Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yon can duplicate a disk image with a Finder drag, no application needed.

I think the OP meant to clone *to* a disk image; i.e. copy the contents 
of a volume to a disk image.

Both SD and Disk Utility will do a one-time job of it just as well. If 
the source volume changes and you want to update the disk image with the 
new data, though, Super Duper has a Smart Update feature that will copy 
over only what's changed, saving a ton of time. Disk Utility can't do 
that; you have to start over again.


-- 
K.

Lang may your lum reek.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

dmg; SuperDuper vs Disk Utility Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-12-24 09:27 -0800
  Re: dmg; SuperDuper vs Disk Utility Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-24 17:38 +0000
    Re: dmg; SuperDuper vs Disk Utility me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-12-24 17:48 +0000
    Re: dmg; SuperDuper vs Disk Utility nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-24 15:05 -0500
  Re: dmg; SuperDuper vs Disk Utility nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-24 15:05 -0500
  Re: dmg; SuperDuper vs Disk Utility Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-12-24 20:12 +0000
  Re: dmg; SuperDuper vs Disk Utility Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-12-24 19:08 -0800

csiph-web