Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #22287
| From | Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? |
| Date | 2013-12-11 14:36 -0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <l8a4a4$73j$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4a645078$0$292$7a628cd7@news.club-internet.fr> <8d349f92-a64b-4837-9f00-cbcc4d07f985@k19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <0a06e88a-f13d-4ced-a49a-361556b80643@googlegroups.com> <l87tmt$860$2@dont-email.me> <1536350.F63rdpPjnV@PointedEars.de> |
Em 10/12/2013 21:22, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn escreveu:
> Denis McMahon wrote:
>
>> function hide(tid,c,h=true){
> ^^^^^
> Syntax error. Default parameters cannot (yet) be defined this way in
> strictly conforming implementations of ECMAScript. You have to initialize
> them if they are not present, for example:
>
> function hide(tid, c, h)
> {
> if (typeof h == "undefined")
> {
> h = true;
> }
Considering your "strictly conforming implementations of ECMAScript",
it could be just:
if (h === undefined) { h = true; }
or
h = h || true;
>
> /* or */
>
> if (arguments.length < 3)
> {
> h = true;
> }
>
> The difference between the first and second approach is that with the second
> one there is no false positive if “undefined” is passed for “h”.
It's not the case, but there is a problem with this sort of testing when
an optional argument is passed a value from another source such as a
configuration object, when it might produce undefined. That's why it is
better to test for undefined.
>
>> var i,t=document.getElementById(tid);
>> for(i=0;i<t.rows.length;i++)
>> t.rows[i].cells[c-1].style.display=h?"none":"table-cell";
>
> t.rows[i].cells[c-1].style.display = h ? "none" : "";
>
> Setting the value of a style property to the empty string resets it to its
> initial value.
>
Good catch.
--
Joao Rodrigues (J.R.)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? kumarcherukuris@gmail.com - 2013-12-10 09:02 -0800
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-10 19:20 +0000
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-10 20:31 +0000
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2013-12-10 22:35 +0000
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 00:16 +0000
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Hans-Georg Michna <hans-georgNoEmailPlease@michna.com> - 2013-12-11 11:16 +0100
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Nisse Engström <news.NOSPAM.uvex6@luden.se> - 2014-02-15 02:38 +0100
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2013-12-11 11:23 -0200
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 19:16 +0000
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-12-11 00:22 +0100
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2013-12-11 14:36 -0200
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-12-11 18:27 +0100
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 19:23 +0000
Re: best method to "hide" a whole <table> column ? Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2013-12-11 22:08 -0200
csiph-web