Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1729
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: There is still a problem with SpinLock... |
| Date | 2013-09-23 04:18 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <l1othi$92q$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <l1ortb$5sm$1@news.albasani.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, I have asked you about Windows critical sections and the starvation problem, and i have just read the following: "The change to unfair locks clearly has the risk of leading to starvation. But, statistically speaking, timing in concurrent systems tends to be so volatile that each thread will eventually get its turn to run, probabilistically speaking. Many more programs would suffer from the convoy problems resulting from fair locks than would notice starvation happening in production systems as a result of unfair locks." read here: http://joeduffyblog.com/2006/12/14/anticonvoy-locks-in-windows-server-2003-sp1-and-windows-vista/ So as you have noticed the Windows critical section has become unfair and since it has become unfair starvation can happen now with windows critical section etc. so some threads may starve for a long time and this not acceptable i think, and not acceptable for me. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
There is still a problem with SpinLock... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-09-23 03:51 -0700 Re: There is still a problem with SpinLock... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-09-23 04:18 -0700 Re: There is still a problem with SpinLock... "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2013-09-23 11:39 -0700
csiph-web