Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #25916
| From | "Ed" <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't |
| Date | 2013-09-22 11:51 +1000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <l1li8f$244$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <eOKdnYSqdZ0yDqbPnZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@supernews.com> <l1j18c$ob9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <YrOdncSUTPKMhaDPnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@supernews.com> <l1k4fp$hqi$1@dont-email.me> <523daff7$0$304$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
Doug Hoffman wrote: > On 9/21/13 8:46 AM, rickman wrote: > > > I don't think you are helping your argument. The DROP at the end of > > your definition is incorrect. > > If you've never made an obvious typo then you're a better man than me. > Or perhaps the example was from a "teachable moment" exercise showing > the problem caused by stack comment mismatch. > > Regardless "Never write a definition without a stack comment" is > fundamental, and solid advice. I agree. Nevertheless it is a curious - and I would say intriguing - fact that there are programmers who are so adept at what they do, that they begin to perform what others in their field see as 'impossible'. "Keep your eyes on the road" is what every learner-driver is told. Yet experienced drivers barely need to.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-09-18 22:55 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-09-18 22:58 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't VoidVolker <voidvolker@gmail.com> - 2013-09-18 23:35 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-19 03:09 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-09-19 01:11 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-19 04:32 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-19 14:15 -1000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't "Ed" <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-09-21 12:48 +1000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-20 17:52 -1000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 08:46 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 10:40 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 10:48 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 18:12 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-09-23 16:59 +0000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-21 17:48 +0000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 19:34 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't "Ed" <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-09-22 11:51 +1000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-09-21 21:09 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-21 13:09 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-21 08:37 -1000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-09-23 17:26 +0000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 02:19 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-19 09:16 +0000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 23:08 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 08:47 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't Spam@ControlQ.com - 2013-09-19 11:16 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 23:07 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 04:37 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-19 22:45 -1000
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-09-20 01:49 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 23:10 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 08:19 -0400
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 23:11 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 23:09 -0700
Re: well this code works and I had some guy say it doesn't Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-09-24 07:46 -0700
csiph-web