Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #13588

Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up?

From Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design, comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up?
Date 2013-09-14 18:06 -0700
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <l131b3$4r6$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <b9f1spFt7feU1@mid.individual.net> <5233a865.521195937@news.kpn.nl> <b9hqjpFg2p1U5@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 13/09/2013 5:57 PM, Joerg wrote:
> Nico Coesel wrote:
>> Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Right now we are using an email provider and Dropbox for our start-up
>>> company. However, we'd like to get a more integrated solution that has
>>> all under one roof and preferably does not engage in vendor-lock. For
>>> example, a solution that requires MS-Outlook is not a good solution.
>>>
>>> What we need:
>>>
>>> 1. Email for a few guys. Accessible also from the road via laptop or
>>> smart phones.
>>>
>>> 2. Calendar and task sync'ing. I am not such a fan of that since I
>>> perfer paper for this but the others would like it.
>>>
>>> 3. Web site hosting.
>>>
>>> 4. File storage and collaboration in an organized fashion, automatic
>>> backups and all that. Access possible via smart phones.
>>>
>>> 5. Secure (encrypted) data transfer between server and our computers.
>>>
>>> 6. Automatic backups, including a routing option for that to one of our
>>> computers.
>>>
>>> 7. The whole thing needs to be controllable for setup and changes by
>>> people with limited or almost no IT know-how.
>>>
>>> 8. No onerous requirements on the PCs such as Java, Active-X or wide
>>> permissions for auto-updates.
>>
>> I'd talk with a local IT company to set this up. ...
>
>
> We don't want to or can't make a thousands of Dollars deal out of this.
> Has to be reasonable.
>
>
>>                                             ... I wouldn't put my
>> data on a cloud service. Other people can tap into that. Another
>> problem with using the cloud is that when things go bad and the bills
>> are not getting paid you lose access to your data.
>>
>
> All backed up, so no problem. Sensitive stuff either won't go on there
> or will be encrypted.
>
>
>> I'd setup a local server with multiple security levels so people can
>> only access what they really need. Usually public, project and
>> management is sufficient. I'd look into Microsoft Small Business
>> server with Exchange. I think this can do everything you want without
>> breaking the bank. You may hate MS but when run on decent server
>> hardware (Dell server or HP Proliant) it will work reliable.
>>
>> The biggest mistake to make here is to also host the website on the
>> local server. Don't do that; just rent web space from one of the many
>> webhosting companies. If you want to tighten security for the remote
>> webmail you can put a filtering proxy (Linux + squid) between the
>> Exchange server and the outside world so only URLs that are allowed
>> get through.
>>
>
> We'd rather like all this as a package, ready to roll, from a provider.
> We can't be the only ones :-)
>

Hi,

Crowd sourced cloud computing, I think businesses are not going to be
interested in this due to security for sure, but still interesting,
I think the beta for it just started in August2013.

https://secure.slicify.com/

cheers,
Jamie

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-12 16:43 -0700
  Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Martin Riddle <martin_rid@verizon.net> - 2013-09-12 20:05 -0400
  Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2013-09-12 19:36 -0700
    Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:53 -0700
  Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? chris <meru@devnull.com> - 2013-09-13 18:41 +0000
    Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2013-09-13 22:22 +0100
    Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:54 -0700
  Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Fred Abse <excretatauris@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 14:50 -0700
    Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Don Y <this@isnotme.com> - 2013-09-13 15:43 -0700
      Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2013-09-14 00:29 +0100
        Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-14 11:08 -0700
      Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2013-09-15 15:23 -0400
        Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Don Y <this@isnotme.com> - 2013-09-15 20:17 -0700
          Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-16 07:47 -0700
    Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:54 -0700
  Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel) - 2013-09-14 00:16 +0000
    Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:57 -0700
      Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2013-09-14 18:06 -0700
        Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? chris <meru@devnull.com> - 2013-09-15 15:13 +0000
          Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2013-09-15 15:28 -0700
        Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-16 07:32 -0700
  Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2013-09-16 09:54 +0300
    Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-16 07:40 -0700
    Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> - 2013-09-18 11:43 -0400

csiph-web