Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #13588
| From | Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design, comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? |
| Date | 2013-09-14 18:06 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <l131b3$4r6$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <b9f1spFt7feU1@mid.individual.net> <5233a865.521195937@news.kpn.nl> <b9hqjpFg2p1U5@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 13/09/2013 5:57 PM, Joerg wrote: > Nico Coesel wrote: >> Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> Right now we are using an email provider and Dropbox for our start-up >>> company. However, we'd like to get a more integrated solution that has >>> all under one roof and preferably does not engage in vendor-lock. For >>> example, a solution that requires MS-Outlook is not a good solution. >>> >>> What we need: >>> >>> 1. Email for a few guys. Accessible also from the road via laptop or >>> smart phones. >>> >>> 2. Calendar and task sync'ing. I am not such a fan of that since I >>> perfer paper for this but the others would like it. >>> >>> 3. Web site hosting. >>> >>> 4. File storage and collaboration in an organized fashion, automatic >>> backups and all that. Access possible via smart phones. >>> >>> 5. Secure (encrypted) data transfer between server and our computers. >>> >>> 6. Automatic backups, including a routing option for that to one of our >>> computers. >>> >>> 7. The whole thing needs to be controllable for setup and changes by >>> people with limited or almost no IT know-how. >>> >>> 8. No onerous requirements on the PCs such as Java, Active-X or wide >>> permissions for auto-updates. >> >> I'd talk with a local IT company to set this up. ... > > > We don't want to or can't make a thousands of Dollars deal out of this. > Has to be reasonable. > > >> ... I wouldn't put my >> data on a cloud service. Other people can tap into that. Another >> problem with using the cloud is that when things go bad and the bills >> are not getting paid you lose access to your data. >> > > All backed up, so no problem. Sensitive stuff either won't go on there > or will be encrypted. > > >> I'd setup a local server with multiple security levels so people can >> only access what they really need. Usually public, project and >> management is sufficient. I'd look into Microsoft Small Business >> server with Exchange. I think this can do everything you want without >> breaking the bank. You may hate MS but when run on decent server >> hardware (Dell server or HP Proliant) it will work reliable. >> >> The biggest mistake to make here is to also host the website on the >> local server. Don't do that; just rent web space from one of the many >> webhosting companies. If you want to tighten security for the remote >> webmail you can put a filtering proxy (Linux + squid) between the >> Exchange server and the outside world so only URLs that are allowed >> get through. >> > > We'd rather like all this as a package, ready to roll, from a provider. > We can't be the only ones :-) > Hi, Crowd sourced cloud computing, I think businesses are not going to be interested in this due to security for sure, but still interesting, I think the beta for it just started in August2013. https://secure.slicify.com/ cheers, Jamie
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-12 16:43 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Martin Riddle <martin_rid@verizon.net> - 2013-09-12 20:05 -0400
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2013-09-12 19:36 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:53 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? chris <meru@devnull.com> - 2013-09-13 18:41 +0000
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2013-09-13 22:22 +0100
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:54 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Fred Abse <excretatauris@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 14:50 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Don Y <this@isnotme.com> - 2013-09-13 15:43 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2013-09-14 00:29 +0100
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-14 11:08 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2013-09-15 15:23 -0400
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Don Y <this@isnotme.com> - 2013-09-15 20:17 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-16 07:47 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:54 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel) - 2013-09-14 00:16 +0000
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-13 17:57 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2013-09-14 18:06 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? chris <meru@devnull.com> - 2013-09-15 15:13 +0000
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2013-09-15 15:28 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-16 07:32 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2013-09-16 09:54 +0300
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-16 07:40 -0700
Re: OT: Cloud IT structure for a start-up? T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> - 2013-09-18 11:43 -0400
csiph-web