Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #10754
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: Browser fingerprinting? |
| Date | 2013-09-13 09:35 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <l0v4bs$6t1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <9sd439tbmqhqgqice5psd6nd3018rcr5v6@4ax.com> <l0tvb5$2ot$1@dont-email.me> <vilain-74BC7C.22490612092013@news.individual.net> |
On 9/13/2013 1:49 AM, Michael Vilain wrote: > In article <l0tvb5$2ot$1@dont-email.me>, Fiver <numeralfive@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 2013-09-12 23:56, Gilles wrote: >>> I'd like to find some good PHP code that does what Panopticlick does, >>> namely uniquely identify a user's browser even when they connect as >>> anonymously as they can, ie. either in incognito mode or by running a >>> browser in a virtual host: >>> >>> www.lifehacker.com/5458513/panopticlick-shows-how-easy-your-browser-is-to-tr >>> ack >>> >>> The goal is to keep trolls away from a site. >> >> In that case, forget it. >> >> The Panopticlick demo isn't intended as something to emulate in >> practice, but rather as something to be aware of. It works best on >> visitors who don't know or don't care about how much information they >> divulge. When I visit the demo site with all of the default plugins >> enabled, I'm a unique snowflake. On the other hand, if I wanted to hide, >> I'd turn plugins and scripting off for that site, and maybe go through a >> proxy, and then I'm just one in a million. >> >> If you target your troll too closely, he can trivially evade your >> filter. If your constraints are too loose, you'll hit some legitimate >> visitors. There's just no way you can win this battle by fingerprinting >> the troll. >> >> Forget it. >> >> >> regards, >> 5er > > I kept getting humans evading my CAPATCHA and sending me marketing SPAM > through my web site's contact form. After a while, I would just go > through the web long and find the IP address that completed the form and > block the entire subnet. So far, entire swaths of China, South America, > and Russia can't view my site. Their connection is refused based on > their IP address. > > A broad brush, I know, but I haven't had any marketing emails to improve > my SEO score, improve my site, or better my mortgage interest rate. > You probably need a different CAPTCHA. Many of the commonly available ones have been broken. I wrote my own and my spam rate has dropped to zero. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Browser fingerprinting? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2013-09-12 23:56 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 22:26 +0000
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2013-09-13 00:38 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2013-09-13 00:43 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 23:29 +0000
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2013-09-13 09:23 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-09-13 09:32 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-09-13 19:13 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-09-14 01:30 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2013-09-12 22:19 +0000
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-09-12 20:31 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-09-13 06:59 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Fiver <numeralfive@gmail.com> - 2013-09-13 05:04 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-09-12 22:49 -0700
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-09-13 09:35 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-09-13 08:42 -0600
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-09-15 20:57 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2013-09-13 09:22 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-09-13 19:30 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Gilles <nospam@nospam.com> - 2013-09-15 00:11 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-09-15 16:27 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-09-15 21:07 -0500
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2013-09-16 11:36 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-09-17 20:02 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-09-17 22:47 -0500
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-09-16 06:13 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-09-16 11:03 +0000
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-09-17 20:11 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-09-17 20:06 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-18 01:33 +0100
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Marc van Lieshout <invalid@example.com> - 2013-09-17 22:53 +0200
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Twayne <nobody@spamcop.net> - 2013-09-17 20:20 -0400
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-09-18 05:06 +0000
Re: Browser fingerprinting? Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-09-18 06:09 -0700
Re: Browser fingerprinting? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2013-09-18 18:24 +0200
csiph-web