Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice)

From	"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
References	(6 earlier) <ee6puap7m5v0al3h9n8msh7mj569f39sp1@4ax.com> <C-SdnQ0DNN45PHHInZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com> <ufbpua5ch4vurfcdsvouoa72gg7q7sodbr@4ax.com> <jfudnbjW3d9vV3HInZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <msis7v$utl$1@pcls7.std.com>
Subject	Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice)
Date	2015-09-07 01:23 -0500
Message-ID	<kpednU1e4MkvsHDInZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:msis7v$utl$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>Do you see any differences between the NIST cartoon and real life in the
>>following video?
>
>>WTC 7 NIST Model vs. Reality
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuyZJl9YleY
>
> Yeah, the videos of the building collapse always start _after_ the east
> penthouse had already collapsed, but the NIST animation includes the east
> penthouse collapse.  If the collapse videos started with the east 
> penthouse
> collapse, the NIST animation makes much more sense as it shows the columns
> under the east penthouse collapsing first, taking the penthouse with it.
>
> For those who haven't seen it, here's the collapse including the east
> penthouse going first.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkOGkdNq13k
>
> Kooksites _never_ show the east penthouse collapsing first as it would
> disprove their claims.  The fact the east penthouse collapsed several
> seconds before we saw the north and west curtain walls go proves that
> a good-sized chunk of the building was ALREADY gone when we saw the
> "start" of the collapse in the videos with the east penthouse collapse
> censored out.

Either way NIST or you for that matter have yet to explain what and where 
something jumped across the street from WTC7 to damage Fiterman Hall.  <G>

And WTC7 clearly fell at 100% freefall for about 100 feet but NIST tried 
their hardest to hide that fact with averages where they started their timer 
as soon as one pixel made a change only a computer could catch well before 
there was any noticeable movement and then stopped their timing well after 
WTC7 had gone down past 100 feet.  See:

Physics - WTC7 Freefall by David Chandler - AE911Truth.org
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpAp8eCEqNA

Rocky

Thread

Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:50 -0500
  Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
    Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:38 -0400
      Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:35 -0500
          Re: Rocky incoherent again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:07 +0000
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:09 -0500
              Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:21 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:45 -0500
                Re: Rocky the stalking lunatic raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 19:26 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 16:21 -0500
                Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:38 +0000
                Re: Strange Features Found in the Naudet Brothers First Strike Footage (jimp forgets about freeze frame again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:08 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:06 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K proves she lies about Dimitri) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:27 -0500
                Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 15:38 -0400
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:33 -0500
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! - (K  is caught bulshitting again.) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:26 -0500
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (test for K the kook) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:22 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 01:23 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:39 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - Why is Roger DESPERATE to divert attention from his own claims? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:10 -0500
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 16:15 -0400
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 16:22 -0500
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K stop your bickering) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:55 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K stop your bickering) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K poves she is a complete asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:42 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K poves she is a complete asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:45 -0500
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:29 -0400
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 19:11 -0400
  Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:39 -0500
    Re: Yet more Rocky delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:01 +0000

csiph-web