Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #1887

Re: fitting to more than 5 variables

From	sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups	comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot
Subject	Re: fitting to more than 5 variables
Followup-To	comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot
Date	2013-06-11 15:59 -0700
Organization	gnuplot development team
Message-ID	<kp89qo$176$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<481037c4-a6a8-45ed-8d33-e0d57a70a0cf@googlegroups.com> <kp0aqp$hl9$1@dont-email.me> <1a15410a-f12a-47a0-b04c-17ae13004c40@googlegroups.com> <kp5n6l$rn6$1@dont-email.me>

Followups directed to: comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot

Show all headers | View raw

sfeam wrote:

> I can imagine a stupid-but-easy solution that simply doubles the size of
> the data structure on 64-bit systems. This would affect all plotting and
> fitting. A cleaner solution might be to allocate space dynamically in the
> fit routines if additional dimensions are required.

Having now delved into the code a bit, I think that increasing the data
storage only for fitting would be trivial.  So I expect that the limit of
5 independent parameters can be removed in the development version to
allow testing.  If it tests out OK, the change will appear in the next
released version.

	Ethan

Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

fitting to more than 5 variables trg818@gmail.com - 2013-06-07 17:18 -0700
  Re: fitting to more than 5 variables sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2013-06-08 15:26 -0700
    Re: fitting to more than 5 variables trg818@gmail.com - 2013-06-09 16:35 -0700
      Re: fitting to more than 5 variables sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2013-06-10 16:28 -0700
        Re: fitting to more than 5 variables sfeam <sfeam@users.sourceforge.net> - 2013-06-11 15:59 -0700

csiph-web