Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.laptops > #1938
| From | "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.laptops |
| Subject | Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access |
| Date | 2013-05-05 15:13 +1200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <km4ihk$83u$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <XnsA1B36F97929F7CSKJHNMW985780A@94.75.214.90> <c49aceb5-fa9a-4ceb-a9de-5fee1e755f1a@googlegroups.com> <kf93o89lfcdkco9sq9tqkc6egtr02is7s9@4ax.com> <klsdgt$446$1@dont-email.me> <XnsA1B4B65A6F0FECSKJHNMW985780A@94.75.214.90> |
Somewhere on teh intarwebs Computer Nerd Kev wrote: > On 02 May 2013, ~misfit~ wrote: > >> Good man George. It's good to see someone who isn't scared >> of a 'stupidly big' PDF file. Those HMMs take >10 seconds >> to d/l > > Yep I agree it takes ">10 seconds" to plop it off the interwebs. > Doing the rough calculations here I find it would probably take > about four times that long on my connection running full speed. > Yes I know that is hardly an age, but I guess I wasn't feeling > awfully inspired yesterday. Ok. >> and open in another 5 seconds in Foxit reader. > > Well my machine isn't really a powerhouse by today's standards, > Firefox hung the first time I tried to open the file, so I > stopped it loading. I could have downloaded it separately and > opened it thereafter but didn't want to download 10MB again. I find it odd in this day and age that you'd think twice about d/ling 10MB. I'm an invalid on welfare so hunted out the best value for money package as I have *zero* leeway with bill paying. Even so, in New Zealand (where teh webs are expensive relatively...) I get 17Mb download speed and 100GB/month allowance - which I'm lucky to use half of. >> They >> seem to cause 'trouble' for computer nerds for some reason. >> <shrug> > > I have a computer set up for the purposes I require of it. Ditto. > Downloading excessively large PDFs is an uncommon occurrence and > one that most frustrates me in any case, as I know I would only > look at a tiny portion of that data in a case like this. I still find it odd to call 10MB 'excessively large'. > I could get on the upgrade train that the web inspires. The > motherboard in the machine I'm using ten years old, back then I > wouldn't be the only one complaining about a 10MB PDF. But I > don't see why I should expend time and money in upgrading every > few years just to make it slightly quicker to interact with > parts of the web that I rarely use and find frustrating in > principal anyway. In fact I'm here on Usenet mainly because I > dislike the bloat and slowness of web forums. My newest machine (my daily user) is a laptop (T60 ThinkPad) from 2007 that I bought second-hand in 2009. Hardly 'cutting-edge'. I too dislike (most) web-forums due to bloated interfaces and have been a usenetter for well over a decade - closer to two actually (my gods! where did the time go?). > In any case, what I said was perfectly correct. If you feel your > purpose here is to inspire everyone to devote themselves as much > as possible to the good of the newsgroup, then good luck to you. Nope, I just found that statement from someone who calls themself 'computer nerd' rather incongruous is all. <shrug> -- /Shaun. "Humans will have advanced a long, long, way when religious belief has a cozy little classification in the DSM." David Melville (in r.a.s.f1)
Back to comp.sys.laptops | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
lenovo y580 cmos battery access rwatthers@gmail.com - 2013-04-30 10:37 -0700
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-05-01 00:57 +0000
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access Richard Watherstone <rwatthers@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 12:32 -0700
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access George <george.ruch74@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 17:41 -0600
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 12:58 +1200
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-05-02 01:28 +0000
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access George <george.ruch74@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 01:08 -0600
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2013-05-04 03:18 +0000
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access George <george.ruch74@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 01:12 -0600
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 15:15 +1200
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-05-02 07:55 +0000
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 04:06 -0700
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-05-02 12:09 +0000
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 05:42 -0700
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-05-06 06:27 +0000
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 15:13 +1200
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-05-06 06:37 +0000
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 12:50 +1200
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2013-05-07 06:32 +0000
Re: lenovo y580 cmos battery access "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 18:52 +1200
csiph-web