Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #7776
| From | J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? |
| Date | 2013-04-05 16:02 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kjmsji$us1$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <kji5s8$31t$5@dont-email.me> <kjkja8$952$1@dont-email.me> <dxn7t.356324$PC7.246790@newsfe03.iad> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Thursday, April 4th, 2013, at 22:55:05h +0000, UnRuh asked:
> Perhaps you should test it and see what happens?
It is below the dignity of persons of such high station to
waster their time testing things when they could be using
that time to think up even more esoteric questions related
to impractical scenarios to pose.
And the houseboy/maid is too busy with other menial chores
to do the testing.
> Why should anyone else waste any time on it?
For the satisfaction of helping one of the world's most eminent
and revered Usenet personalities.
If in doubt, remember the words of Jacob Zuma --
"We worked together on many things.
We were helping each other.
We also worked together underground.”
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Avoid9Pdf@gmail.com - 2013-04-03 20:11 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2013-04-03 21:10 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-04-03 22:34 +0100
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-04 04:40 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2013-04-04 14:01 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Avoid9Pdf@gmail.com - 2013-04-04 19:12 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-04-04 20:43 +0100
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? orcus@pwr.wroc.pl - 2013-04-05 03:43 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2013-04-05 19:54 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-04 22:55 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-04-05 09:12 +0100
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-05 16:35 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-04-05 17:50 +0100
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2013-04-05 16:02 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2013-04-05 19:58 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:44 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2013-04-05 19:51 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Surinder <Surinder.Singh@example.net> - 2013-04-09 11:20 +0530
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2013-04-08 14:37 +0000
Re: Is bash.sh compiled or interpreted? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2013-04-08 21:08 +0300
csiph-web