Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #616125
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The greatest baby step |
| Date | 2023-07-27 00:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kiec9nF8bgpU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <brGVrNVPkigMNGrSc_pCYeaixfI@jntp> <kiaoe0FjdseU1@mid.individual.net> <f61a93bf-97ec-4f2b-a3bd-e87d9eaa3255n@googlegroups.com> <kidj6rF4ohhU1@mid.individual.net> <8557784e-3db6-4d68-829e-ef3f7e662865n@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/26/2023 10:00 PM, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote: > On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 4:57:51 PM UTC-5, whodat wrote: > >> It is posited ideas that matter, not persons. > > One of my Wikipedia acquaintances is an anti-Einstein > crackpot who, at the same time, is quite competent in > the theories that he claims Einstein stole whole-heartedly > from Poincare, Lorentz, Minkowski, etc. He's written a > book bashing Einstein, and maintains a blog where he > constantly rants against Einstein, evolution, how the > U.S. is being overrun by non-white minorities, transgender > people, atheists, Jews, Chinese, the teaching of foreign > languages in school, etc. > > Nevertheless, when he posts a technical correction to > a physics article in Wikipedia, he generally knows what > he is writing about. He contributions to physics history, > however, always bear close watching. And still, your emphasis above is on the ideas. It seems to me that the ideas stand for themselves and your interest in the person is secondary if that actually has any significance. Consider please that relativity as a concept is still important today whether any person is pro or con. And Einstein as well as any others who had a hand in creating the concept(s) are long dead, still the ideas live on and continue to be fought over. The originator(s) are unimportant and frankly always were. The same thing is true of those generating input today. I post as "whodat" because who I am is of no consequence, my ideas/words should speak for themselves and for very much the same reason I have not "outed" Jane/Laurence. We spar, but AFAIC that is a matter of dissenting ideas, not dissenting people regardless of how difficult isolating people from their ideas may be from time to time.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The greatest baby step Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-25 18:23 +0000
Re: The greatest baby step Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 20:45 +0200
Re: The greatest baby step Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-25 19:28 +0000
Re: The greatest baby step Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 22:08 +0200
Re: The greatest baby step Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-25 20:41 +0000
Re: The greatest baby step Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 08:11 -0700
Re: The greatest baby step Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-26 15:57 +0000
Re: The greatest baby step Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 18:19 +0200
Re: The greatest baby step Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 22:03 -0700
Re: The greatest baby step Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 13:39 -0400
Re: The greatest baby step Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 22:03 -0700
Re: The greatest baby step Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 01:16 -0400
Re: The greatest baby step Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 23:06 -0700
Re: The greatest baby step whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-26 16:57 -0500
Re: The greatest baby step Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 20:00 -0700
Re: The greatest baby step whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 00:05 -0500
Re: The greatest baby step Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 08:09 -0700
Re: The greatest baby step Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-27 09:33 +0000
Re: The greatest baby step Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-25 19:32 +0000
Re: The greatest baby step Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-26 16:00 +0000
Re: The greatest baby step Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 09:19 -0700
Re: The greatest baby step Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 18:23 +0200
Re: The greatest baby step Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-26 16:38 +0000
Re: The greatest baby step Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:06 -0700
Re: The greatest baby step Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 20:33 +0200
Re: The greatest baby step Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-26 19:11 +0000
Re: The greatest baby step Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 08:59 +0200
Re: The greatest baby step Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 16:00 -0700
csiph-web