Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #6097

Re: offset 1 list indexing

From Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: offset 1 list indexing
Date 2011-06-15 02:51 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <kfny613e81s.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> (permalink)
References <rubrum-E97163.21022514062011@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> writes:

> I want to index into a list using offset one indexing.
> The obvious thing to do is make a pointer that points
> one element before the list.
>
> void work_on_stuff(int *offset0, int length)
> {
>     int offset1 = offset0 - 1;
>
>     for(idx = 1; idx <= length; idx++)
>     {
>          ... offset1[idx] ...
>     }
> }
>
> Is this likely to fail? Possible to fail?
> Very unlikely to fail? Not guaranteed by the standard?

(Assuming 'offset0' actually points to the start of an array
rather than somewhere further on:)

Not guaranteed by the Standard, and a bad idea even though
currently it probably works in many (most?) compilers.

As compilers get more aggressive at code improvement, code
like this with undefined behavior gets more likely to cross
over into the compiler equivalent of the Neutral Zone.  If
and when that happens, most likely one of two things will
result:  one, the optimizer won't realize its assumptions
have been violated, and bogus code will be generated;  or
two, the optimizer _will_ realize its assumptions have been
violated, but will fall back to an ultra-conservative
position for code generation, preserving correctness but
sacrificing performance.

Neither of these possibilities is really good, but what's
worse is that they might start happening any time there is a
switch to a new compiler (or a different choice of compiler
options);  worse still, unless you are very careful you will
start to get bad results before realizing what has happened.
There's an old Polish proverb that says, Even if you are the
person who buried all the land mines, walking through a
minefield is no fun.


(TIA: "an old Polish proverb" isn't really a Polish
proverb - it's meant to be humorous for the cognoscenti.)

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

offset 1 list indexing Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-14 21:02 -0700
  Re: offset 1 list indexing Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-06-14 21:29 -0700
  Re: offset 1 list indexing Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-06-15 05:58 +0100
  Re: offset 1 list indexing Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-06-15 02:51 -0700
  Re: offset 1 list indexing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-06-15 12:01 +0200
    Re: offset 1 list indexing gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 03:55 -0700
  Re: offset 1 list indexing Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@pobox.com> - 2011-06-15 11:07 +0100
    Re: offset 1 list indexing Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-06-15 07:30 -0700
      Re: offset 1 list indexing Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-06-15 11:19 -0600
        Re: offset 1 list indexing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-15 22:57 -0400
        Re: offset 1 list indexing Joseph Huber <joseph.huber@NOREPLY.web.de> - 2011-06-16 09:28 +0200
          Re: offset 1 list indexing Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-06-16 15:05 +0000
          Re: offset 1 list indexing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-06-24 01:14 +0200
      Re: offset 1 list indexing Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-15 15:33 -0700
    Re: offset 1 list indexing Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-15 15:28 -0700
      Re: offset 1 list indexing Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-15 23:34 -0400
        Re: offset 1 list indexing Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-15 21:42 -0700
          Re: offset 1 list indexing Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-16 08:18 -0400
            Re: offset 1 list indexing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-16 08:32 -0400
              Re: offset 1 list indexing Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-06-16 06:29 -0700
                Re: offset 1 list indexing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-16 09:43 -0400
              Re: offset 1 list indexing Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-16 20:50 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-17 08:56 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-17 15:11 +0000
            Re: offset 1 list indexing Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-16 23:54 -0700
              Re: offset 1 list indexing Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-23 21:45 +0300
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-06-25 09:30 -0700
                Re: offset 1 list indexing pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-06-25 13:10 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-25 18:18 +0000
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-25 15:56 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-25 17:42 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-26 04:15 +0000
                Re: offset 1 list indexing pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-06-26 01:51 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-26 15:48 +0000
                Re: offset 1 list indexing pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-06-27 00:30 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-28 21:26 +0300
                Re: offset 1 list indexing pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-06-28 23:36 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-29 15:28 +0000
                Re: offset 1 list indexing pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-06-30 15:02 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2011-06-26 07:00 +0000
                Re: offset 1 list indexing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-26 15:20 +0000
                Re: offset 1 list indexing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-26 03:41 +0000
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-26 08:51 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-26 15:32 +0000
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-26 11:48 -0400
                Re: offset 1 list indexing cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-06-26 16:43 +0000
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-28 21:30 +0300
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Karl Malbrain <malbrain@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-28 14:13 -0700
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-28 21:14 +0300
                Re: offset 1 list indexing Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-06-29 01:14 -0700
  Re: offset 1 list indexing Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:21 -0400
  Re: offset 1 list indexing Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 10:09 -0400
    Re: offset 1 list indexing Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-15 15:38 -0700
  Re: offset 1 list indexing China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-25 21:04 -0700
    Re: offset 1 list indexing Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-26 09:01 -0400
    Re: offset 1 list indexing Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-26 13:15 -0700

csiph-web