Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #98695

Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked?

From Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked?
Date 2016-12-10 07:16 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <kfn8trnlsqi.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> (permalink)
References <a0d1d564-8497-4ffc-ac99-649d36901891@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> writes:

> The `entry` keyword.  They must have put some thought
> into it to reserve that name for so long.  But there
> must also have been insurmountable difficulty in the
> way of getting it right, or else they'd've done it.
>
> So, how might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked?
> What was the point?  What can it do?  Could it be done now?
> Why (not)?

This is an FAQ, 20.37:

   http://c-faq.com/misc/entry.html

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-08 20:57 -0800
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2016-12-09 07:28 +0100
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 00:25 -0800
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 00:32 -0800
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 00:53 -0800
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-09 13:11 +0000
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-12-09 16:36 +0100
      Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-09 16:00 +0000
      Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-09 16:18 +0000
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2016-12-09 11:25 -0500
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 15:51 -0800
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-12-09 12:48 -0500
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-12-09 18:16 +0000
  Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-12-10 07:16 -0800
    Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-12-10 16:58 +0100
      Re: How might multiple `entry` points have looked/worked? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-12-14 21:15 -0800

csiph-web