Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #2896
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.crypt, sci.logic, comp.programming, comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. |
| Date | 2013-01-24 15:18 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kds4vp$if7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <7bc7d5ba-8edc-4c67-be6b-7eefc730e266@ui9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <kdr8vs$uf2$1@dont-email.me> <1aeMs.59793$H5.54101@newsfe28.iad> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 1/24/2013 12:27 PM, unruh wrote: > On 2013-01-24, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: >> On 1/24/2013 12:10 AM, Martin Musatov wrote: >>> >>> The techniques all listed above and the intellectual property rights >>> associated with them are (C) Copyright 2013 Martin Musatov. They may >>> be used or adapted by any entity provided partial credit is provided >>> to Martin Musatov and is documented as well as when this occurs in >>> conjunction with a non-public donation to a charity equal to the value >>> of the contribution. >>> >> >> And not worth the bandwidth they took to process. >> >> BTW - you can copyright text (including code), but you cannot copyright >> a concept. If your concept were worth anything, anyone could use it at >> any time without any credit to you or any payment to anyone. >> >> If you want to protect a concept you need to patent it. > > Except you cannot patent concepts either. You can patent things or > processes or designs, but not concepts or ideas. > And you cannot copyright "intellectual property". The category > "intellectual property" refers to things which a copyrightable, > patentable or trademarkable. It is not a category which has any > independent definition beyond the definition of those categories. > It is an entirely artificial concept with the word "property" used in a > purely mataphoric sense. >> In the United States you can, anyway. I don't know about the rest of the world. Many computer algorithms are patented. For instance, the RSA algorithm is U.S. Patent 4,405,829. I don't see that as any different than what the op is proposing. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. Martin Musatov <marty.musatov@gmail.com> - 2013-01-23 21:10 -0800
Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. Martin Musatov <marty.musatov@gmail.com> - 2013-01-23 21:15 -0800
Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-01-24 07:21 -0500
Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-24 17:27 +0000
Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-01-24 15:18 -0500
Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2013-01-24 14:48 -0600
Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-01-24 16:35 -0500
Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2013-01-24 16:49 -0600
Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-01-24 20:03 -0500
Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. marty.musatov@gmail.com - 2014-02-09 10:31 -0800
csiph-web