Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.std.c > #1829

Re: null pointer constant, address constant

From Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Newsgroups comp.std.c
Subject Re: null pointer constant, address constant
Date 2013-01-09 00:44 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <kciegj$bam$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <50D0D492.20007@verizon.net> <kar2ku$o89$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kar51c$oaj$1@dont-email.me> <kas4pv$to2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87pq24gqt2.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> writes:
>> float must be ieee 32bit format otherwise the whole math
>> implementation is invalid
> 
> Woh, when did that happen? I have a box which has non-IEEE754 floats,
> and it aren't even in 36-bit lala-land.

happened in c99

the only way to have usable floating-point in c currently is to assume
c99 annex f (which is unfortunately not widely supported by compilers)
(with annex f float is ieee binary32 and double is ieee binary64)

without annex f there is no guarantee about the precision (and various
other properties) of float operations which is not adequate for
practical usage
(basic assumptions might not hold, eg. .2+.3 > .4 can be false, which
makes writing robust numerical algorithms hard/impossible)

(one can of course rely on the implementation defined floating-point
behaviour of the given platform, but that's outside the semantics
specified by c hence not portable, the necessary amount of ifdeffery
to make up for that is impractical)

some ppl think that weak semantics for floating-point arithmetics
is enough to write working numeric code, but the history of the
previous failed attempts at that hints otherwise

Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

null pointer constant, address constant Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> - 2012-12-18 13:25 +0000
  Re: null pointer constant, address constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-18 09:53 -0500
    Re: null pointer constant, address constant Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> - 2012-12-18 20:06 +0000
      Re: null pointer constant, address constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-18 15:39 -0500
        Re: null pointer constant, address constant Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> - 2012-12-19 00:44 +0000
          Re: null pointer constant, address constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-18 20:24 -0500
            Re: null pointer constant, address constant Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> - 2012-12-19 10:27 +0000
              Re: null pointer constant, address constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-19 07:15 -0500
              Re: null pointer constant, address constant Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-21 03:03 +0200
                Re: null pointer constant, address constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-21 12:13 -0500
                Re: null pointer constant, address constant Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> - 2013-01-09 00:44 +0000
                Re: null pointer constant, address constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-01-08 20:21 -0500
                Re: null pointer constant, address constant Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-01-08 20:46 -0500
          Re: null pointer constant, address constant Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 20:37 -0500
      Re: null pointer constant, address constant Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 16:15 -0500
        Re: null pointer constant, address constant Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-18 15:52 -0800
          Re: null pointer constant, address constant Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 19:12 -0500
            Re: null pointer constant, address constant Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 19:51 -0500
          Re: null pointer constant, address constant Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-18 17:02 -0800
          Re: null pointer constant, address constant "christian.bau" <christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-20 05:34 -0800
            Re: null pointer constant, address constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-20 10:33 -0500
              Re: null pointer constant, address constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-20 12:28 -0500
                Re: null pointer constant, address constant Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-20 21:13 -0800
              Re: null pointer constant, address constant Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-20 21:05 -0800
            Re: null pointer constant, address constant Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-12-20 12:17 -0500
            Re: null pointer constant, address constant Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-20 12:10 -0800
              Re: null pointer constant, address constant Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-20 21:25 -0800
  Re: null pointer constant, address constant Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 14:02 -0500
    Re: null pointer constant, address constant Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> - 2012-12-18 20:09 +0000
      Re: null pointer constant, address constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-12-18 15:54 -0500
        Re: null pointer constant, address constant Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 16:18 -0500

csiph-web