Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #17857
| From | Osmo Saarikumpu <osmo@weppipakki.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: FAQ Topic - How do I get my browser to report javascript errors? (2012-12-21) |
| Date | 2012-12-28 04:34 +0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <kbj0fd$fmm$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <50d3a68a$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <kbigfl$efo$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2934007.S8BWbaCmEH@PointedEars.de> |
On 28.12.2012 0:30, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Before you discount the value of a FAQ for a newsgroup too quickly, please > consider that various efforts, some by regular contributors, are currently > underway to fork, improve and even rewrite the FAQ for this newsgroup. I see myself as valuing the efforts of maintaing and improving the FAQ. At the same time I'm considering the points brought up by Mr. Korpela. Before I proseed, I must state that I've always valued Mr. Korpela's opinions and I'm his countryman === perhaps I'm biased here. > The FAQ postings, on the other hand, are so far from a two years outdated, > unmaintained FAQ instead. The person responsible for posting them either is > not informed about that or does not care. Your point is very well taken. > And JFTR, Jukka K. Korpela is neither a (long-time) regular nor (IMHO) a > contributor at all here. I'm sure that you are right in the money in a technical sense. But at the same time, I'm sure that he has a say in anything he sees as debatable. His input, in my experience, is never shallow. > And if I am not very much mistaken, neither are you. You are correct. I'm in a sense a regular, but not capable of technical contribution (== presenting code). But your point arises (or does it beg) the question: is it all about techniques? What about foresight? If I've understood Mr. Korpela's point correctly, he would direct us (anybody that sees any need to follow this group, regardless of technical skills) to the future, by questioning the status quo and looking forward (without undermining the past). > A newfound interest in this newsgroup leading to future valuable > contributions to this newsgroup is always welcome. But it should not be up > to people like you to decide or advise what should or should not be done > with regard to the FAQ of a newsgroup you have not actually been using or > making a valuable contribution to. Please take in account that I'm not deciding anything nor advising anybody. I'm expressing my opinion like anybody else here, with the same right that you have to your opinion. Please do not confuse (group) seniority or technical ability with freedom of speech. -- Best wishes, Osmo
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
FAQ Topic - How do I get my browser to report javascript errors? (2012-12-21) "FAQ server" <javascript@dotinternet.be> - 2012-12-21 00:00 +0000
Re: FAQ Topic - How do I get my browser to report javascript errors? (2012-12-21) Osmo Saarikumpu <osmo@weppipakki.com> - 2012-12-28 00:01 +0200
Re: FAQ Topic - How do I get my browser to report javascript errors? (2012-12-21) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-27 23:30 +0100
Re: FAQ Topic - How do I get my browser to report javascript errors? (2012-12-21) Osmo Saarikumpu <osmo@weppipakki.com> - 2012-12-28 04:34 +0200
Re: FAQ Topic - How do I get my browser to report javascript errors? (2012-12-21) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-12-28 12:56 +0100
Re: FAQ Topic - How do I get my browser to report javascript errors? (2012-12-21) Dr J R Stockton <reply1252@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-12-29 19:12 +0000
Re: FAQ Topic - How do I get my browser to report javascript errors? (2012-12-21) Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2012-12-29 22:32 -0800
csiph-web