Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.legal > #103953

Re: -- OOPS ON IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> In article <w96dnZ9Cx6Xez935nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100
> @gmail.com says...
>> 
>> dolf wrote:
>>> 19 APRIL 2023
>>> 
>>> MATTERS RELEVANT TO IBAC CASE-2022XXXX AS COMPLAINT LODGED 17 JULY 2002 
>>> BEING ITEM: 27. IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR 
>>> PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?
>>> 
>>> 1)    It ought then to be substantive cause to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES 
>>> against legal counsel PETER RIDDELL for PERJURY and perverting the 
>>> COURSE OF JUSTICE by a deliberate misrepresentation of two telephone 
>>> calls made to them in a matter of self representation before a BLIND 
>>> judicatory. That my conduct in matters of this complaint was mindful 
>>> that PRESERVATION of any probity related to such action against the 
>>> INSURER was a primary concern.
>>> 
>>> YOUTUBE: "MUSE - RESISTANCE"
>>> 
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPE9uSFFxrI>
>>> 
>>> I HAVE NOT LABOURED FOR 25 YEARS JUST SO SOMEONE CAN STEAL MY LIFE 
>>> OPPORTUNITY which is enumerated within our 17 APRIL 2023 submission to 
>>> IBAC in conveying the use of MATRIX PROTOTYPES #SIX (#123 / #369) as 
>>> TWEEDLEDUM[B] and #ONE (#99 / #297) TWEEDLEDEE[D] as an established fact 
>>> in then providing an "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" against an INSURER's 
>>> IMPROPRIETY by deploying a term dichotomy such as ?TOTAL AND PERMANENT 
>>> DISABILITY? as involving destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and 
>>> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle
>>> 
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
>>> 
>>> 2)    The concept of a #232 - HIJACKING SCHEMA perpetuated as a 
>>> "gennaion pseudos" (ie. honourable or noble lie) against the SOVEREIGN / 
>>> AUTONOMY dynamic were considerations also raised (ie. the IDENTICAL 
>>> MATRICES were provided) within our submissions of 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 as 
>>> made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION:
>>> 
>>> "In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ie. 
>>> PROTOTYPE #NINE WITHIN BOTH 9x9 MATRICES) applicable to the INSURANCE / 
>>> FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY that if the perennial [philosophical] use of 
>>> the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 
>>> + #3 + #4 = #10}  has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND 
>>> TWEEDLEDEE[D] and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as ?TOTAL 
>>> AND PERMANENT DISABILITY? as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE 
>>> INSURANCE POLICY and that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2 
>>> + #3 + #4 = #10 capable of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and 
>>> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle.
>>> 
>>> Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance 
>>> benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD 
>>> - POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective 
>>> GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend 
>>> definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF 
>>> HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS 
>>> THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY.
>>> 
>>> That the Insurance Industry?s failure to appropriately manage and in 
>>> circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention 
>>> to the precursor medical condition: ?HYPER-AROUSAL OF THE CENTRAL 
>>> NERVOUS SYSTEM AND STRESS OF THE STARTLE REFLEX? is then (ie. I can 
>>> articulate time after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27 
>>> March 1986) causal for the exasperation of the medical condition in[to] 
>>> a chronic state."
>>> 
>>> 3)    To that end, we have provided a psychiatrist who specialises in 
>>> METAPHOR THERAPY and a cognitive scientist (Monash University) our 
>>> informal research case study on the use of a four line lyric as then a 
>>> NEURAL LINGUISTIC SPACIAL OVERLAY and META DESCRIPTORS (#317, #205, 
>>> #144, #383) for an event intervention against MURDOCH press over US 
>>> PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S IRELAND visit to thwart seditious contemporaneous 
>>> local actions by IRISH REPUBLICANISM
>>> 
>>> 4)    From correspondence with FRANCESCO DE FERRARI the AMP CHIEF 
>>> EXECUTIVE OFFICER dated 29 JUNE 2020 (who as an ITALIAN took no action 
>>> because of an intention to sell those products and services), it was 
>>> stated that my last conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE" 
>>> failed on the basis that such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it 
>>> to be) being entirely defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from 
>>> MEDIA REPORTS OF 27 APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL 
>>> ASSISTING THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL 
>>> PROSECUTION OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF 
>>> 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND 
>>> ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG'.
>>> 
>>> WE USED THIS EXACTING EXAMPLE IN OUR SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL 
>>> SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: By suggesting the imperative of #432 - 
>>> DISHEARTENING was an impost purposed {TORAH #FIVE: #114 / #342; #SIX: 
>>> #123 / #369 v?s HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342 by #FIVE: #111 / #333; #ONE: 
>>> #99 / #297 impetus} upon the Dutch troops and the United Nations 
>>> authority itself does not in any manner diminish the suffering of the 
>>> people but diminishes the culpability of the Dutch entirely since they 
>>> themselves were the targets and the #419 - SLAUGHTER the means.
>>> 
>>> Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now 
>>> grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL 
>>> COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL 
>>> (AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous 
>>> letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as 
>>> the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on 
>>> 30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the 
>>> INSURER.
>>> 
>>> ----------
>>> 
>>> TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS
>>> 
>>> FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334 
>>> HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31 
>>> AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM 
>>> NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:
>>> 
>>> Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell?s 
>>> submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001 
>>> in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone 
>>> calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence. 
>>> The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and 
>>> conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004 
>>> obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative 
>>> Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7 
>>> December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over 
>>> A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group 
>>> Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by 
>>> telephone hook-up.
>>> 
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
>>> 
>>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
>>> 
>>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have 
>>> Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
>>> 
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called 
>>> on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the 
>>> Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter 
>>> raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I 
>>> understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason 
>>> why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless 
>>> there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by 
>>> bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if 
>>> necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then 
>>> determine how best to deal with it.
>>> 
>>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held, 
>>> if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the 
>>> Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact 
>>> what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain 
>>> what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of 
>>> course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has 
>>> finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
>>> 
>>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a 
>>> telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that 
>>> he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages 
>>> on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those 
>>> messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my 
>>> family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the 
>>> matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I 
>>> not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am 
>>> presenting myself by way of telephone today.
>>> 
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
>>> 
>>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript 
>>> of those
>>> 
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
>>> 
>>> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
>>> 
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate 
>>> to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the 
>>> matter it ought to be on evidence.
>>> 
>>> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
>>> 
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
>>> 
>>> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the 
>>> volume.
>>> 
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
>>> 
>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm 
>>> just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my 
>>> previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their 
>>> transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that 
>>> co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this 
>>> year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a 
>>> matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from 
>>> which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.
>>> 
>>> You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have 
>>> until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand 
>>> against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude 
>>> when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."
> 
> is this anything
> 

A definition of insanity most likely.   HTH

____
Xeno

Back to aus.legal | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

-- OOPS ON IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-20 06:35 +1000
  Re: -- OOPS ON IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT? % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 14:42 -0600
    Re: -- OOPS ON IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT? Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-19 15:04 -0600
      Re: -- OOPS ON IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT? Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-04-20 00:05 +0000

csiph-web