Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Noob <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: inline functions |
| Date | 2012-12-05 11:26 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k9n765$a6e$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <c2857271-6c38-4e2f-8af6-28a47f929bf8@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <Fd6dnWil9-L98S7NnZ2dnUVZ7oSdnZ2d@lyse.net> <slrnkbd0d4.1jc.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <50B684C5.10109@verizon.net> <slrnkbtf68.1jc.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
Jorgen Grahn wrote: > True, there are other considerations. But the claim was that compilers > can't generate optimized code if debug info is enabled, and that was > what I was questioning. On a related note, gcc now supports a "-Og" optimization level. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-Og-734 > Optimize debugging experience. -Og enables optimizations that do not > interfere with debugging. It should be the optimization level of > choice for the standard edit-compile-debug cycle, offering a > reasonable level of optimization while maintaining fast compilation > and a good debugging experience. Regards.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-24 12:20 +0000
Re: inline functions SG <sgesemann@gmail.invalid> - 2012-11-24 14:52 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-24 14:48 +0000
Re: inline functions Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl> - 2012-11-24 15:59 +0100
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-24 16:25 +0100
Re: inline functions Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2012-11-24 19:18 +0100
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-24 15:07 +0000
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-24 15:33 +0000
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-24 17:17 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-24 16:39 +0000
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-24 18:13 +0100
Re: inline functions Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-11-24 19:36 +0100
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-12-05 03:19 -0200
Re: inline functions Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-12-05 10:57 +0100
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-12-05 15:34 -0200
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-25 09:43 +0000
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-25 11:32 +0100
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-27 21:55 +0000
Re: inline functions "christian.bau" <christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk> - 2012-11-26 04:16 -0800
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-26 14:13 +0100
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-28 21:27 +0000
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-28 16:40 -0500
Re: inline functions Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-11-28 14:15 -0800
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-29 00:02 -0200
Re: inline functions Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-29 07:24 -0800
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-29 11:04 -0500
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-29 14:44 -0200
Re: inline functions Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-29 12:44 -0600
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-29 20:43 -0200
Re: inline functions Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-29 20:14 -0600
Re: inline functions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-30 07:44 +1300
Re: inline functions Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@riseup.net> - 2012-11-29 20:38 -0200
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-12-05 03:17 +0000
Re: inline functions Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-12-05 11:26 +0100
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-26 11:23 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-26 13:01 +0000
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-26 14:24 +0100
Re: inline functions Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-26 05:35 -0800
Re: inline functions Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-11-26 07:57 -0600
Re: inline functions Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-26 07:07 -0800
Re: inline functions Rosario1903 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-27 09:46 +0100
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-27 10:50 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-26 14:14 +0000
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-26 15:14 +0000
Re: inline functions Rosario1903 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-27 09:46 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-27 14:41 +0000
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-27 11:01 +0100
Re: inline functions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-27 14:37 +0000
Re: inline functions Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-11-27 18:22 +0100
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-27 12:55 -0500
Re: inline functions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-11-27 22:06 +0000
Re: inline functions David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-11-29 09:47 +0100
Re: inline functions glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-11-26 14:39 +0000
Re: inline functions Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-24 07:20 -0800
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-24 10:44 -0500
Re: inline functions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-24 10:35 -0500
Re: inline functions Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2012-11-24 22:56 -0800
Re: inline functions James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-11-25 01:18 -0800
csiph-web