Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.theory > #507
| From | Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.theory |
| Subject | Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added |
| Date | 2012-11-28 08:39 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <k94ijt$m8p$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <10bed76e-2985-4471-9660-42b96270b07b@googlegroups.com> <slrnkb4koa.9sf.eric@teckel.deptj.eu> <601d8dc0-f2cc-4fa0-98c0-d7376f787269@googlegroups.com> <slrnkba8kq.60p.eric@teckel.deptj.eu> <1a1ac63d-ecd1-4256-9746-7ee18bef5f53@googlegroups.com> |
sergei.sheinin@gmail.com wrote: > > EAV is a bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad idea, and if your language has >> no use beyond dealing with EAV, then it is at best pointless. >> >> >> >> Eric >> > > My lesson from posting here is that I must do a better presentation > of a language of higher level in respect to procedural SQL and with > ability to update programming logic without affecting underlying > schema. Wrong. The lesson we're trying to give you is to learn some basics then review the capabilities and shortcomings of existsing products, and then propose better solutions. Another lesson you should learn is that no one actually _wants_ yet another procedural language. Thankfully the one thing you haven't mentioned is "object oriented". Keep it that way. Art
Back to comp.databases.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Keeping schema static as objects are added sergei.sheinin@gmail.com - 2012-11-25 07:03 -0800
Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added Eric <eric@deptj.eu> - 2012-11-25 17:19 +0000
Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added sergei.sheinin@gmail.com - 2012-11-25 19:18 -0800
Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added Eric <eric@deptj.eu> - 2012-11-27 20:29 +0000
Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added sergei.sheinin@gmail.com - 2012-11-27 19:38 -0800
Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2012-11-28 08:39 +0000
Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added sergei.sheinin@gmail.com - 2012-11-29 09:31 -0800
Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2012-11-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2012-11-27 14:17 +0000
Re: Keeping schema static as objects are added sergei.sheinin@gmail.com - 2012-11-27 08:00 -0800
csiph-web