Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Large number libraries/algorithms |
| Date | 2012-10-24 07:18 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k68ipb$hl4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <vm9b88hl9qirqv7i8pnq5j3un82bvmsnik@4ax.com> <0.4b9d32dea7f57a2ad3b4.20121023000110BST.87ipa29knd.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <wNmdnbKqcMPz1xvNnZ2dnUVZ7oSdnZ2d@lyse.net> <lnipa1dkoy.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <UqqdnTtQPYLmDhrNnZ2dnUVZ7r-dnZ2d@lyse.net> |
On 10/24/2012 03:01 AM, David Brown wrote: ... > I noticed that (on gcc 4.5 on Linux-64). There is also no int128_t or > related types in <stdint.h>. And there is no way to express an int128_t > literal for targets that whose "long long" is smaller than 128 bits. On > x86-64, "long long" is 64-bit (with "long" being 32-bit on Windows, > 64-bit on Linux), so until "long long long int" or "really long int" is > added to C, the language is missing a bit of support for 128-bit integers. There's no need for that - that's what int128_t, int_least128_t and int_fast128_t are reserved for. The language isn't missing anything, it's just that particular implementation which has failed to implement something which is already part of the language. -- James Kuyper
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Large number libraries/algorithms boltar2003@boltar.world - 2012-10-22 09:11 +0000
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@pobox.com> - 2012-10-22 10:15 +0100
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Heikki Kallasjoki <fis+usenet@zem.fi> - 2012-10-22 09:19 +0000
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms boltar2003@boltar.world - 2012-10-22 09:40 +0000
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-10-22 11:24 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-22 13:29 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms boltar2003@boltar.world - 2012-10-22 11:53 +0000
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-22 08:01 -0400
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-22 14:41 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-22 09:36 -0400
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-22 15:12 +0100
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-22 10:31 -0700
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-10-22 15:09 -0500
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-23 00:01 +0100
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-23 09:38 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Steve Thompson <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2012-10-23 12:40 +0000
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-23 16:23 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Steve Thompson <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2012-10-23 14:38 +0000
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-23 12:58 -0700
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-24 09:01 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-24 07:18 -0400
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-24 14:23 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-24 14:43 +0100
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-24 11:33 -0700
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-24 19:53 +0100
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-24 10:50 -0400
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Noob <root@localhost> - 2012-10-24 15:16 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Noob <root@localhost> - 2012-10-24 18:57 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-24 11:43 -0700
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-25 09:05 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-22 08:23 -0400
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2012-10-22 11:40 -0700
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-22 17:05 -0700
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2012-10-23 07:10 -0700
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-22 14:42 +0200
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2012-10-23 14:39 -0700
Re: Large number libraries/algorithms pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-10-24 03:27 -0400
csiph-web