Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #27469

Re: callback function

From "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: callback function
Date 2012-10-21 14:35 -0400
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <k61f8k$kat$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <6f84885kvafnr4vmb12o1a4o0tgl9u628p@4ax.com> <k5usd7$s6r$1@speranza.aioe.org> <re56889tlmivf62oijj5hdoiiggks1ush4@4ax.com> <k5vaph$u55$1@speranza.aioe.org> <3a17889uhiiqj8disb3iuqsla9oighmnd0@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Barry Schwarz wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:06:29 -0400, "Bill Cunningham"
> <billcun@suddenlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Barry Schwarz wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> No I can't.  What is a good example to me might not be a good
>>> example to you.  But the people who mostly volunteer their time to
>>> try to define a usable and useful product have by consensus decided
>>> that const has enough merit to justify its inclusion in the
>>> standard.
>>>
>>> I'm willing to bet you have never needed the 22 functions declared
>>> in complex.h,
>>
>> No. Never used complex.h
>>
>> at least 3 of the functions declared in ctype.h,
>>
>> Bet I have.
>
> Would you care to show us the code you wrote that uses iscntrl(),
> isgraph(), or ispunct()?

    I don't have the code but it was isalph() isnum() and that's all I 
remember.

>> the 11
>>> functions declared in fenv.h
>>
>>    Never heard of fenv.h
>>
>> and the associated pragma, the 4
>>> functions declared in inttypes.h,
>>
>>    Sure I have.
>
> How about the code that use imaxabs(), imaxdiv(), strtoimax(),
> wcstoimax(), or wcstoumax()?  Yes, there are five, I miscounted.

    Not my code but it involved inmaxdiv(). I've used more than any 
functions types like uin64_t or uint32_t. That's why I used stdint.h.

>> the 2 functions declared in
>>> locale.h,
>>
>> No I've never use locale.h
>>
>> along with several hundred other features of the language.
>>> The C standard would be a lot smaller and simpler if they just
>>> consulted you before putting in all this useless to you junk.
>>>
>>> The correct response to your post should have been "It's worth
>>> nothing."
>>
>>    I've used stdint.h too.
>
> Since stdint.h doesn't declare any functions so your response is a
> non-sequitur.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 17:16 -0400
  Re: callback function John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-10-17 21:36 +0000
    Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 17:44 -0400
      Re: callback function John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-10-17 21:51 +0000
        Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-18 00:11 +0100
        Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:37 -0400
          Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-19 01:16 +0100
          Re: callback function Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-20 06:48 -0700
    Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-18 10:45 +1300
      Re: callback function pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-10-19 14:49 -0400
        Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 16:59 -0400
        Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 17:04 -0400
          Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-19 14:14 -0700
            Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 17:31 -0400
              Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-19 14:54 -0700
                Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 18:42 -0400
    Re: callback function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-17 17:47 -0400
    Re: callback function tom st denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2012-10-19 04:44 -0700
      Re: callback function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-19 08:24 -0400
  Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-17 14:39 -0700
    Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 17:50 -0400
      Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-18 11:00 +1300
        Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:20 -0400
        Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:24 -0400
          Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-18 22:30 -0700
          Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-20 11:58 +1300
            Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 19:27 -0400
              Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 19:43 -0400
                Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-19 21:09 -0700
          Re: callback function Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-20 06:53 -0700
      Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 19:25 -0400
        Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-18 13:34 +1300
          Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-17 20:41 -0400
            Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-18 14:37 +1300
              Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:17 -0400
                Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-20 11:54 +1300
              Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:54 -0400
                Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-19 01:23 +0100
                Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 20:32 -0400
                Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-19 02:43 +0100
                Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 16:56 -0400
                Re: callback function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-10-19 22:10 +0100
                Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-18 22:30 -0700
                Re: callback function Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-10-19 12:37 -0400
                Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 16:52 -0400
    Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-19 18:44 -0400
      Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-19 21:09 -0700
        Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-20 15:01 -0400
          Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-20 12:47 -0700
          Re: callback function Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-10-20 14:51 -0500
          Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-20 14:39 -0700
            Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-20 19:06 -0400
              Re: callback function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-10-20 22:22 -0700
                Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-21 14:35 -0400
                Re: callback function Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-10-22 10:58 -0400
              Re: callback function Bill Cunningham <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-24 17:28 -0700
          Re: callback function Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-21 11:32 +1300
            Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-20 15:51 -0700
      Re: callback function Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-11-25 22:39 -0600
  Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-17 17:51 -0700
    Re: callback function Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-18 20:34 +0300
    Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:15 -0400
      Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:27 -0400
      Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-18 15:47 -0700
        Re: callback function "Bill Cunningham" <billcun@suddenlink.net> - 2012-10-18 18:52 -0400
      Re: callback function blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2012-10-25 10:01 +0000
        Re: callback function Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-10-25 12:44 -0400
          Re: callback function blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2012-10-26 12:48 +0000
  Re: callback function Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-11-25 22:13 -0600
    Re: callback function Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-26 03:42 -0800
    Re: callback function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-26 06:59 -0500
    Re: callback function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-26 23:03 -0800

csiph-web