Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1726
| From | no.top.post@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking, comp.mail.sendmail |
| Subject | Re (3): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.networking, comp.mail.sendmail |
| Date | 2012-10-14 08:10 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k5ds1h$t09$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <TECQXhvKj0FX-pn2-Jcf6P7pOq9KM@SATURN.home> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.networking, comp.mail.sendmail
In article <TECQXhvKj0FX-pn2-Jcf6P7pOq9KM@SATURN.home>, "Robert Blair" <nobody@nowhere.not> wrote: > On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:49:59 UTC, no.top.post@gmail.com wrote: > --snip-- > > Will you please tell me how. > > Use a port other than 25 when you connect to your email server. > > > > > The simple answer is that you set your mail transport agent to pass on > > > > all outgoing mail to your ISP's mail relay as a "smart host", as exim > > > > calls it. > > > > Where's the docos on how to do that? > > Look at the sendmail documentation on how to configure sendmail to use a > "smart host". --> OK: goog: sendmail+%22smart+host%22 > -- > > > Check with the company that supplies your email server to see > > > what other ports they have open for email other than port 25. > > > If your living amongst sheep, you might suceed with animal psychology provided you were skilled at it, else it's best to try technology. > > > I expect they have at least port 587 and possibly 465. > > > > > No, ports 587 & 465 <fail> > > I would have expected at least one to work, are you sure you configured the > email client correctly? > `telnet <smtpAdr> <port>` Is easy and ambigious > Call the company that is supplying your email server and ask the what ports > are available. One email server I use requires you use SSL and use port 995 > to get email and port 465 to send email. Another email server requires that I > POP before send to port 587. > OK, I remember once that, <after a pop-fetch 'it knew' me, for smtp>. As you add more variables: ISPs, ports, UserIDs .. the choas becomes unmanageable. So re-applying to the mail-lists just adds more confusion. > -- > Robert Blair
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-11 17:52 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? David Hough <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-10-11 20:28 +0100
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2012-10-11 22:17 +0200
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-10-11 23:53 +0100
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> - 2012-10-12 13:12 +1100
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-12 09:54 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> - 2012-10-13 00:42 +1100
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? David Hough <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-10-12 15:47 +0100
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-12 10:59 +0200
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-10-15 15:30 +0000
Re (2): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-15 20:40 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-10-15 23:32 +0100
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-10-16 01:36 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? "Robert Blair" <nobody@nowhere.not> - 2012-10-12 01:13 -0500
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2012-10-12 11:02 +0200
Re (2): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-13 04:49 +0000
Re: Re (2): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? "Robert Blair" <nobody@nowhere.not> - 2012-10-13 01:51 -0500
Re (3): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-14 08:10 +0000
Re (2): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-13 08:48 +0000
Re (3): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-14 18:59 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? Joe Zeff <the.guy.with.the.sideburns@lasfs.info> - 2012-10-12 07:22 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? David Hough <noone$$@llondel.org> - 2012-10-12 15:58 +0100
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-12 09:54 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-10-11 21:21 +0100
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-12 09:54 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-10-12 22:40 +0100
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-14 08:10 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? Bob Hauck <postmaster@avalanche.org> - 2012-10-14 08:38 -0400
Re (2): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-14 18:36 +0000
Re: Dud: ISP so send mail directly? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-10-14 14:25 +0100
Re (2): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-14 18:37 +0000
Re: Re (2): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-10-14 23:44 +0100
Re (3+): Dud: ISP so send mail directly? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-10-15 11:46 +0000
csiph-web