Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #27046

Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite

From Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite
Date 2012-10-05 19:33 +0100
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <k4n948$9j2$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <20120926111001.677@kylheku.com> <k47vs3$t2m$1@speranza.aioe.org> <20120929201156.311@kylheku.com> <k49ill$6n8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ln1uhjtdd9.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 30/09/2012 22:22, Keith Thompson wrote:

> Having said all that, I personally would like to see much better
> support for the current C standard, and I find, for example,
> Microsoft's decision not to support either C99 or C11 annoying.
> But Microsoft doesn't get enough money from me for my opinion to
> be very relevant to them.
>

I take on board the possibility that I am being overly pedantic but the 
point of the original post that lead to this somewhat off-topic 
discussion was the intention to get more C compilers to support the full 
C11 standard irrespective of whether they also continue to support 
previous C standards (via the common -std=cxx compiler switch).

I fail to see how trying to get more compilers to fully support the C11 
standard is a bad thing.

Specifically this response struck me as being ridiculous and somewhat 
idiotic:

On 26/09/2012 19:11, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
 > On 2012-09-14, Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> wrote:
 >> It is essential that the C community makes some noise about C11 
 >>support
 >
 > No, it isn't. Not only is is not essential, it is counterproductive.
 > The "C community" should just go about its business and not mess with 
 > its compilers or libraries, except in those areas where they are 
 >foudn to be broken.

(Apologies if the quoting above appears broken. Thunderbird isn't the 
best NNTP client in the world)

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

C11 Compiler Test Suite Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-09-14 22:20 +0100
  Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite steve.b.hafner@gmail.com - 2012-09-22 08:03 -0700
    Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-09-26 12:54 +0100
  Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-09-26 18:11 +0000
    Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-09-30 00:22 +0100
      Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-09-30 04:14 +0000
        Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-09-30 14:49 +0100
          Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 15:16 +0100
          Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-30 14:47 -0400
          Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-30 14:22 -0700
            Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-10-05 19:33 +0100
              Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-05 14:57 -0400
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-10-05 22:07 +0100
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-10-07 14:04 +0100
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-11-12 00:04 -0600
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-12 10:07 -0500
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-12 10:11 -0800
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-11-12 13:27 -0600
              Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-10-05 12:07 -0700
              Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-10-05 20:25 +0000
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-10-05 21:44 +0100
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-10-05 21:14 +0000
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-10-05 22:32 +0100
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Chicken McNuggets <chicken@mcnuggets.com> - 2012-10-05 21:49 +0100
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-10-05 17:37 -0400
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-10-05 17:15 -0500
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-05 18:47 -0700
                Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-10-05 21:29 -0500
          Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-10-01 21:56 +0000
            Re: C11 Compiler Test Suite pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2012-10-01 23:41 +0000

csiph-web