Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #25879

Re: code

From "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: code
Date 2012-09-03 21:17 -0400
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <k23krj$bso$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <k215tf$b93$1@speranza.aioe.org><0.c99f3778f5dea1cf9e21.20120903115142BST.87obln4bwh.fsf@bsb.me.uk><k22u1n$km6$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ln4nnex3ww.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org><k238ne$fsc$1@speranza.aioe.org> <k238um$gb3$1@speranza.aioe.org><0.d2fa98a7ebe095ac71c4.20120903232342BST.87bohmwxsh.fsf@bsb.me.uk><k23bo1$mvq$1@speranza.aioe.org><0.60ca2eaad9967b48e079.20120904001625BST.87627uwvcm.fsf@bsb.me.uk><k23gce$1p2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <0.0ce1e1334c809c60b4e8.20120904020711BST.87txvevbnk.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

Show all headers | View raw

Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> I wouldn't.  In a similar style to what I suggested for scanf, I'd
> loop based in success not the negation of failure.  I'd test loop
>
>  ...} while (nread > 0 && nwrite > 0);
>
> Anything other that this condition must be a problem of some sort.
> What you've done is to test for one reason to stop: the end of the
> input, but there are other possible problems: read errors and write
> errors especially.

    So would I check with feof() and ferror(). How is that done? After the
nread>0&&fwrite>0 fails?

Bill

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-02 22:50 -0400
  Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-02 22:53 -0400
  Re: code Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-09-02 21:21 -0700
  Re: code Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-02 22:23 -0700
    Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 06:56 -0400
  Re: code Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-03 07:47 +0000
  Re: code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-03 11:51 +0100
    Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 09:02 -0400
      Re: code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-03 15:02 +0100
        Re: code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-03 17:20 +0100
        Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 14:33 -0400
    Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 14:48 -0400
      Re: code Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-03 13:11 -0700
        Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 17:41 -0400
          Re: code Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-03 14:53 -0700
            Re: code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-03 23:10 +0100
          Re: code "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2012-09-03 16:56 -0500
            Re: code Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-03 18:27 -0700
        Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 17:50 -0400
          Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 17:54 -0400
            Re: code Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-09-03 15:12 -0700
            Re: code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-03 23:23 +0100
              Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 18:42 -0400
                Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 19:11 -0400
                Re: code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-04 00:16 +0100
                Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 20:01 -0400
                Re: code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-04 02:07 +0100
                Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-03 21:17 -0400
                Re: code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-04 02:24 +0100
                Re: code Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-09-03 20:55 -0700
                Re: code Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-04 11:16 +0100
              Re: code Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-04 14:09 -0400
          Re: code Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-09-04 14:07 -0400
            Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-04 18:35 -0400
              Re: code Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-04 18:49 -0500
                Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-04 20:56 -0400
                Re: code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-09-04 22:05 -0400

csiph-web