Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c |
| Subject | Re: VLAs use less stack |
| Date | 2012-09-01 22:59 +0200 |
| Organization | lccwin |
| Message-ID | <k1tsui$40h$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <k1q5bu$49h$1@speranza.aioe.org> <k1qgl7$j58$1@news-rocq.inria.fr> <k1tnd8$h6r$1@dont-email.me> |
Le 01/09/12 21:24, John Nagle a écrit : > So at some point, > there's a conflict between address space assigned to the heap > and address space assigned to the stack. Linux usually limits > stack growth to 12MB. Yes. And in this times of byte inflation 12MB is considered "minuscule". AWFUL... Windows 3.1 had 64K stack, and we developed good applications there.
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
VLAs use less stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-31 12:58 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack Marc <marc.glisse@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 14:10 +0000
Re: VLAs use less stack Marc <marc.glisse@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 14:13 +0000
Re: VLAs use less stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-31 18:09 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-08-31 18:14 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2012-09-01 12:24 -0700
Re: VLAs use less stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-01 22:57 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-01 22:59 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-31 11:42 -0700
Re: VLAs use less stack Marc <marc.glisse@gmail.com> - 2012-09-01 10:18 +0000
Re: VLAs use less stack Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-09-01 19:18 +0100
Re: VLAs use less stack Marc <marc.glisse@gmail.com> - 2012-09-01 19:19 +0000
Re: VLAs use less stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-01 23:01 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-01 11:36 -0700
Re: VLAs use less stack Marc <marc.glisse@gmail.com> - 2012-09-01 19:05 +0000
Re: VLAs use less stack jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-09-02 16:56 +0000
Re: VLAs use less stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-02 14:22 -0700
Re: VLAs use less stack jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-09-04 00:39 +0000
Re: VLAs use less stack Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-09-04 10:28 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2012-09-04 11:31 -0700
Re: VLAs use less stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-04 17:02 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-02 23:28 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-02 14:37 -0700
Re: VLAs use less stack John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2012-09-02 15:45 -0700
Re: VLAs use less stack Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2012-09-04 00:03 +0200
Re: VLAs use less stack jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-09-01 16:09 +0000
Re: VLAs use less stack Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-01 11:45 -0700
Re: VLAs use less stack jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-09-01 23:05 +0200
csiph-web