Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch |
| Subject | Relentless DDoS out there (was: google usenet archives - up or down?) |
| Date | 2026-10-07 16:02 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jwvece12szr.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <119c1aa$1okot$1@dont-email.me> <2026Sep28.075333@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <119d8mm$23bo0$3@dont-email.me> <jwvbj9hfaqd.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> <11a4p5e$2jpr4$3@dont-email.me> |
Lawrence D’Oliveiro [2026-10-07 06:34:22] wrote: > On Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:18:36 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> It also means that DDoS is now a normal everyday occurrence for any >> site whatsoever. It makes a qualitative change in the sense that it >> takes a professional sysadmin to manage even the most innocuous >> web-server. > I don’t think having a “professional sysadmin” in charge is any > assurance against DDOS attacks. The only remedy seems to be seriously > grunty hardware acting as a filter frontend to get rid of as much of > the rubbish as possible before letting anything through to the actual > content/application server. AFAIK hardware won't save you: there's an actual arms race going on, and you need wetware in there to adapt the response to the ever-evolving forms of the incoming DDoS. That's because the attackers work hard to make their incoming "rubbish" requests look as much as possible as the legitimate requests. BTW, this whole arms race is not just a problem for administrators of servers, but also for clients. More and more, you can't use `curl` or `wget` to download PDF articles, because they get hidden behind "are you human?" checks. Similarly the response to the arms race tends to prevent legitimate scraping, such as when you want to maintain a mirror for use behind a firewall, or say the Internet Archive. Currently, the effort goes into technical means to guess which requests are kosher, but I think it's ultimately impossible to do that without imposing too many restrictions. I'd much prefer an approach based on governance, with ways to impose sanctions on abusers. === Stefan
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
google usenet archives - up or down? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-27 18:23 +0300
Re: google usenet archives - up or down? Joseph Seigh <jseigh_es00@xemaps.com> - 2026-09-27 17:20 -0400
Re: google usenet archives - up or down? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-09-28 05:53 +0000
Re: google usenet archives - up or down? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-09-28 10:32 +0200
Re: google usenet archives - up or down? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2026-09-28 15:18 -0400
Re: google usenet archives - up or down? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-07 06:34 +0000
Relentless DDoS out there (was: google usenet archives - up or down?) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2026-10-07 16:02 -0400
Re: google usenet archives - up or down? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-30 03:38 +0000
Re: google usenet archives - up or down? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-30 12:53 +0300
Re: google usenet archives - up or down? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-10-08 14:33 -0700
csiph-web