Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Unsinged types |
| Date | 2012-07-19 22:56 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <juahdc$qbq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ju9p6k$rg0$1@speranza.aioe.org> <87obnbfjvm.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <juaatu$tmp$1@dont-email.me> <0.bb3e422f423a5f0ff005.20120720023238BST.87liifb4jt.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
On 7/19/2012 9:32 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> writes:
>
>> On 7/19/2012 6:47 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> Jase Schick <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi Does C still need unsigned types? My preferred language Java manages
>>>> perfectly well without them. Do many people ever use unsigned types
>>>> nowadays and if so why? In a 64-bit world, the extra range is rarely
>>>> worth the hastle it seems to me.
>>>
>>> Many quantities are naturally unsigned; for example, counts and
>>> sizes. These quantities are most naturally modeled with unsigned
>>> types.
>>
>> Indeed. If you use a singed type to hold an inherently
>> unsinged value, you're playing with fire.
>
> I agree with the "indeed", but I am not sure I see why you added that
> one would be "playing with fire". Can you say a bit more about that?
It's a pnu.
--
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Unsinged types Jase Schick <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-07-19 20:03 +0000
Re: Unsinged types Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-19 21:29 +0100
Re: Unsinged types jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-07-19 23:15 +0200
Re: Unsinged types Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-07-19 16:46 -0500
Re: Unsinged types Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-07-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-19 21:06 -0400
Re: Unsinged types Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-20 02:32 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-07-19 21:08 -0500
Re: Unsinged types Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-20 04:26 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-19 22:56 -0400
Re: Unsinged types Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-20 14:57 -0400
Re: Unsinged types Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-07-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-20 14:56 -0400
Re: Unsinged types Seungbeom Kim <musiphil@bawi.org> - 2012-07-20 14:11 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-20 17:41 -0400
Re: Unsinged types Seungbeom Kim <musiphil@bawi.org> - 2012-07-21 14:07 -0700
Re: Unsinged types "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-21 22:26 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-07-22 00:01 -0700
Re: Unsinged types "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-22 10:37 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 11:34 -0700
Re: Unsinged types gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 00:06 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 11:30 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-22 14:29 +0300
Re: Unsinged types "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-22 14:43 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-22 19:12 +0300
Re: Unsinged types Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-07-22 12:14 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-07-21 14:57 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-20 00:11 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-07-20 10:00 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-07-20 23:48 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-21 15:24 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-07-21 08:53 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-21 17:48 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-07-21 11:22 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-21 22:35 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-07-21 14:55 -0700
Re: Unsinged types "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-07-21 18:27 +0100
Re: Unsinged types Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-07-21 11:37 -0700
Re: Unsinged types Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-23 14:02 -0400
Re: Unsinged types Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-07-23 12:21 -0700
Re: Unsinged types pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-07-23 23:57 -0400
Re: Unsinged types "Bill Leary" <Bill_Leary@msn.com> - 2012-07-20 20:21 -0400
Re: Unsinged types "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-07-22 10:36 +0200
csiph-web