Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c |
| Subject | Re: The C Containers Library |
| Date | 2012-07-15 23:12 +0200 |
| Organization | lccwin |
| Message-ID | <jtvbo0$lhm$3@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4FF9E523.6000006@spamsink.net> <e2ec6f9a-e019-4388-8293-22109594aad9@googlegroups.com> <jtvbjd$lhm$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
Le 15/07/12 23:10, jacob navia a écrit : > What is the problem of storing an element in multiple containers that is > feasible without problems in the proposed library: you store just a > pointer to the objectinstead of the object itself. The you can > store the object in as many containers as you wish. That sentence makes no sense sorry. It should be: For storing an object in multiple containers you store a pointer to the object instead of the whole object. That way, it is YOU that owns the memory and the library allocates just the space needed to allocate a pointer.
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The C Containers Library jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-07-08 21:53 +0200
Re: The C Containers Library agottem@gmail.com - 2012-07-15 13:13 -0700
Re: The C Containers Library jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-07-15 23:10 +0200
Re: The C Containers Library jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-07-15 23:12 +0200
Re: The C Containers Library agottem@gmail.com - 2012-07-15 16:15 -0700
Re: The C Containers Library jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-07-16 10:22 +0200
csiph-web