Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #23074

Re: typedef struct

From James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: typedef struct
Date 2012-07-02 07:12 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jsrvm9$8te$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <ln7gvqhnw2.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <4fee1eb1$0$23463$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <ln1ukx3hnb.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <4ff11bee$0$26142$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <lnk3ym1z45.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/02/2012 02:00 AM, Keith Thompson wrote:
> Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> writes:
>> On 6/29/2012 4:58 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>> Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> writes:
>>>> On 6/1/2012 1:45 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>>> Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith)kst-u@mib.org   <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
>>>>>       Will write code for food.
>>>>> "We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
>>>>>       -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
>>>>
>>>> Looks like someone needs to answer "Pushing you out a rather high window
>>>> is something.  Therefore, we must do that too."
>>>
>>> Any particular reason?
>>
>> Whoever that quote came from appears to need to think some more, and
>> this answer should help start that thinking.
> 
> Perhaps you missed the fact that the quote is intended to be humorous.

If was clearly intended to be humorous by the real-world author.
However, was it intended to be humorous by the fictional character who
spoke that line? Having seen only a little of that show, I had assumed
that it was an expression of bureaucratic incompetence so extreme that
"Pushing you out a rather high window" would have led to a significant
improvement in government efficiency. There did seem to be several
characters on that show who could plausibly have spoken such a line
without humorous intent.
-- 
James Kuyper

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: typedef struct Kulin <remailer@reece.net.au> - 2012-05-31 19:10 +0000
  Re: typedef struct Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-31 15:14 -0400
    Re: typedef struct Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-06-01 02:50 +0200
    Re: typedef struct 张源 西北工业大学 <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 10:02 -0700
      Re: typedef struct Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-08 13:20 -0400
        Re: typedef struct 张源 西北工业大学 <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 10:27 -0700
          Re: typedef struct Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-08 13:32 -0400
            Re: typedef struct 张源 西北工业大学 <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 10:37 -0700
              Re: typedef struct Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-08 13:55 -0400
                Re: typedef struct Zhang Yuan <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 11:22 -0700
                Re: typedef struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-08 14:35 -0400
                Re: typedef struct Zhang Yuan <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 11:41 -0700
                Re: typedef struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-08 14:22 -0700
                Re: typedef struct Zhang Yuan <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 18:28 -0700
                Re: typedef struct Zhang Yuan <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 11:08 -0700
  Re: typedef struct Xavier Roche <xroche@free.fr.NOSPAM.invalid> - 2012-05-31 21:14 +0200
    Re: typedef struct 张源 西北工业大学 <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 10:20 -0700
      Re: typedef struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-08 14:31 -0400
        Re: typedef struct Zhang Yuan <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 11:45 -0700
          Re: typedef struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-08 15:10 -0400
            Re: typedef struct Zhang Yuan <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 12:27 -0700
        Re: typedef struct Zhang Yuan <zhabgyuan1993@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 11:48 -0700
  Re: typedef struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-05-31 14:24 -0700
    Re: typedef struct Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-06-01 10:20 +0200
      Re: typedef struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-01 11:45 -0700
        Re: typedef struct Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-02 07:52 +1200
        Re: typedef struct Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-06-01 21:54 +0000
        Re: typedef struct "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-01 23:36 +0100
        Re: typedef struct Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201206.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-06-02 23:31 +0200
          Re: typedef struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-02 18:30 -0700
        Re: typedef struct Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-06-29 16:29 -0500
          Re: typedef struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-29 14:58 -0700
            Re: typedef struct Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-07-01 22:55 -0500
              Re: typedef struct Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-07-01 23:00 -0700
                Re: typedef struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-07-02 07:12 -0400

csiph-web