Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Joe." <antelope3@news.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Design decisions |
| Date | 2012-06-25 00:28 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <js90i8$6g6$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jrvvlb$8k1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <js025k$hjm$1@dont-email.me> |
"BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> wrote in message news:js025k$hjm$1@dont-email.me... > "jacob navia" <jacob@spamsink.net> wrote in message > news:jrvvlb$8k1$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> In the new "templated" form of the containers library I have now that all >> data retrieving functions return the data directly: >> >> int (*GetElement)(intList *l,size_t idx); >> >> The problem is that it is not possible to return an error >> with this configuration: Since the return value is an >> int, any error code could be actually some data!! >> >> The solution is to return a pointer to the data and NULL >> if there is an error, as the other functions of the library do. > ... >> What do you think? > > How does C++ deal with it? > > My feeling is that GetElement should be as simple and convenient to use as > possible, especially for the 99.999% of calls (and usually 100%) where > there is no error. Perhaps have two versions, one where any errors are > handled internally (either aborting, returning an agreed default value, or > whatever), and another which has full error returns for people who insist > on checking every single list access themselves. > He sucked you in?
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-21 22:19 +0200
Re: Design decisions Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-06-21 21:43 +0100
Re: Design decisions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-21 22:02 +0100
Re: Design decisions Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 23:23 +0100
Re: Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-22 09:12 +0200
Re: Design decisions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-22 19:44 +1200
Re: Design decisions "Joe." <antelope3@news.net> - 2012-06-25 00:32 -0600
Re: Design decisions gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 01:00 -0700
Re: Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-22 10:08 +0200
Re: Design decisions Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 17:18 +0100
Re: Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-22 18:27 +0200
Re: Design decisions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-23 08:44 +1200
Re: Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-22 23:58 +0200
Re: Design decisions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-23 10:21 +1200
Re: Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-23 02:13 +0200
Re: Design decisions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-23 12:59 +1200
Re: Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-23 11:03 +0200
Re: Design decisions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-23 21:52 +1200
Re: Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-23 12:32 +0200
Re: Design decisions Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-06-23 13:54 +0100
Re: Design decisions "Joe." <antelope3@news.net> - 2012-06-25 00:36 -0600
Re: Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-22 10:42 +0200
Re: Design decisions Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 17:18 +0100
Re: Design decisions jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-24 18:32 +0200
Re: Design decisions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-21 18:43 -0400
Re: Design decisions "Joe." <antelope3@news.net> - 2012-06-25 00:40 -0600
Re: Design decisions "Joe." <antelope3@news.net> - 2012-06-25 00:28 -0600
Re: Design decisions "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-06-22 08:35 +0200
Re: Design decisions Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-06-22 12:40 +0000
Re: Design decisions gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 06:01 -0700
Re: Design decisions Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-06-22 14:26 +0000
Re: Design decisions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-06-22 14:01 +0100
Re: Design decisions David Resnick <lndresnick@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 06:13 -0700
Re: Design decisions Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-06-22 19:05 +0200
Re: Design decisions "Joe." <antelope3@news.net> - 2012-06-25 00:27 -0600
csiph-web