Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Breakthrough |
| Date | 2012-06-04 15:32 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jqikei$spb$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jqi6o4$gqf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jqi95i$mmp$1@news.albasani.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In comp.lang.c++ MelissA <melis@a.com> wrote:
> #define N 10000000
>
> int main()
> {
> std::list<int> L1;
> long long sum=0,newSum=0;
> for(int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
> {
> int d = rand();
> sum+=d;
> L1.push_back(d);
Your test is basically useless as a measurement of sorting speed because
the vast majority of the time will be spent on those push_back() calls.
If you want to test sorting speed and nothing else, you have to discard
the time spent in memory allocation.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Breakthrough jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-04 13:38 +0200
Re: Breakthrough MelissA <melis@a.com> - 2012-06-04 14:20 +0200
Re: Breakthrough Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-06-04 15:32 +0000
Re: Breakthrough Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-06-04 15:44 +0000
Re: Breakthrough jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-04 18:03 +0200
Re: Breakthrough Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-05 10:23 +1200
Re: Breakthrough jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-05 00:31 +0200
Re: Breakthrough Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@studio.unibo.it> - 2012-06-05 01:43 +0200
Re: Breakthrough Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-05 00:26 +0000
Re: Breakthrough jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-04 17:47 +0200
Re: Breakthrough Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-06-05 05:36 +0000
Re: Breakthrough Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2012-06-04 12:32 -0400
Re: Breakthrough MelissA <melis@a.com> - 2012-06-04 21:44 +0200
Re: Breakthrough MelissA <melis@a.com> - 2012-06-04 22:01 +0200
Re: Breakthrough jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-04 22:42 +0200
Re: Breakthrough MelissA <melis@a.com> - 2012-06-05 00:16 +0200
Re: Breakthrough MelissA <melis@a.com> - 2012-06-05 00:47 +0200
Re: Breakthrough MelissA <melis@a.com> - 2012-06-05 03:34 +0200
Re: Breakthrough 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-06 17:28 -0700
Re: Breakthrough "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-04 17:30 +0100
Re: Breakthrough jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-04 19:30 +0200
Re: Breakthrough "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-04 19:18 +0100
Re: Breakthrough jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-04 20:50 +0200
Re: Breakthrough "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-05 00:31 +0100
Re: Breakthrough pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-04 17:23 -0400
Re: Breakthrough Noob <root@localhost> - 2012-06-05 09:10 +0200
Re: Breakthrough Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-06-05 08:03 +0000
Re: Breakthrough pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-06 00:20 -0400
Re: Breakthrough Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-06 00:06 -0500
Re: Breakthrough pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-06 09:10 -0400
Re: Breakthrough Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-06 09:23 -0500
Re: Breakthrough pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-06 19:49 -0400
Re: Breakthrough Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-06-07 15:10 +0000
Re: Breakthrough jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-08 01:37 +0200
Re: Breakthrough pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-08 09:55 -0400
Re: Breakthrough pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-08 21:26 -0400
Re: Breakthrough pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-09 23:49 -0400
Re: Breakthrough 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-11 06:50 -0700
Re: Breakthrough pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-11 22:36 -0400
Re: Breakthrough Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-05 10:02 +1200
Re: Breakthrough jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-05 00:26 +0200
csiph-web