Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison |
| Date | 2012-05-12 10:30 +0200 |
| Organization | lccwin |
| Message-ID | <jol728$3js$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <jojrg3$66s$2@speranza.aioe.org> <a15br0F58bU1@mid.individual.net> <87ehqpj51g.fsf@gmail.com> <jol4jh$tpt$1@speranza.aioe.org> <a16k51Fa8uU2@mid.individual.net> |
Le 12/05/12 10:09, Ian Collins a écrit :
>
> Kindly explain (I bet you won't) how
>
> List *L;
> int data;
> L = iList.Create(sizeof(int));
>
> data = 0;
> iList.Add(L,&data);
> iList.PushFront(L,&data);
> data = 2;
> iList.InsertAt(L,1,&data);
> data = 5;
> iList.Add(L,&data);
> data = 6;
> iList.Add(L,&data);
> iList.Apply(L,PrintInt,stdout);
> iList.Finalize(L);
>
> gives the user more control and is less error prone than than
>
> list<int> L = {0, 2, 0, 5, 6};
>
Wait Ian, if I use C99 I can write:
List *L = iList.InitializeWith(sizeof(int),5, (int []){0, 2, 0, 5, 6});
The purpose of my example was to show how Add, InsertAt, etc are used,
not to build precisely a list of those 5 integers!
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 18:59 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-05-11 17:54 +0000
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 19:59 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 20:31 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 21:56 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 21:02 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:12 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 21:18 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:01 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 21:08 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:04 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 21:11 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:15 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison cartec69@gmail.com - 2012-05-11 13:17 -0700
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:06 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-12 08:41 +1200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-05-12 07:18 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 09:48 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-12 20:09 +1200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 10:30 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-12 21:23 +1200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 11:39 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-12 23:02 +1200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-12 13:14 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 14:35 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-05-13 10:59 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-11 23:36 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-12 00:25 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-12 01:58 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-11 19:30 -0700
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 09:49 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-05-12 18:31 +0200
csiph-web