Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison |
| Date | 2012-05-12 09:49 +0200 |
| Organization | lccwin |
| Message-ID | <jol4mo$tpt$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jojghh$91l$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jok4b4$plu$1@dont-email.me> |
Le 12/05/12 00:36, BartC a écrit : > "jacob navia" <jacob@spamsink.net> wrote in message > news:jojghh$91l$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> Here is a comparison of two source codes that use the C++ STL and the >> C containers library (ccl). > >> List *L; >> int data; >> >> L = iList.Create(sizeof(int)); >> >> data = 0; >> iList.Add(L,&data); > > Shame you can't use immediate data. Then that line becomes: > > ilist.Add(L,0); > You can specialize the sample implementation file to an int list. In that case, you make a new interface automatically called iIntList and you use iIntList.Add(L,0);
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 18:59 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-05-11 17:54 +0000
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 19:59 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 20:31 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 21:56 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 21:02 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:12 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 21:18 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:01 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 21:08 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:04 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-11 21:11 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:15 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison cartec69@gmail.com - 2012-05-11 13:17 -0700
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-11 22:06 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-12 08:41 +1200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-05-12 07:18 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 09:48 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-12 20:09 +1200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 10:30 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-12 21:23 +1200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 11:39 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-12 23:02 +1200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-12 13:14 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 14:35 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-05-13 10:59 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-11 23:36 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-12 00:25 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-12 01:58 +0100
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-11 19:30 -0700
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-12 09:49 +0200
Re: CCL vs STL: a comparison Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-05-12 18:31 +0200
csiph-web