Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #15194

Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you?

Show all headers | View raw

On 2012-4-3 13:28, Juha Nieminen wrote:
>>
>> void doSth(const char *name)
>> {
>>   assert(name!=NULL);
>>   // no other usages of 'name'
>> }
>
>    A compiler should be smart enough to not give a warning in the above
> case even if NDEBUG is defined (because, after all, the variable *is*
> used: As a parameter to a macro.)

When compiler sees the code, that line has gone if NDEBUG is defined
because it's removed by preprocessor if assert is empty when NDEBUG
is defined.
So there is still warning, no?


-- 
WQ

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-02 19:16 +0800
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? "Fred Zwarts \(KVI\)" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl> - 2012-04-02 13:39 +0200
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-04-02 09:49 -0400
      Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-02 22:01 +0800
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-04-02 11:50 -0400
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2012-04-02 12:54 -0700
      Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-03 05:27 +0000
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-04-03 08:02 +0000
          Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-03 14:19 +0000
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Mike McCarty <mcmccarty@gmail.com> - 2012-04-02 06:43 -0700
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? GM <GM@no.spam.it> - 2012-04-02 14:41 +0200
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-04-02 16:55 +0200
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-03 05:28 +0000
      Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-03 13:54 +0800
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-03 14:09 +0000
          Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-03 11:21 -0500
            Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-04-04 17:39 +0200
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-04-02 15:13 +0000
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-02 11:37 -0500
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-03 10:29 +0800
      Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-04-03 06:00 +0200
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-03 13:56 +0800
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? goran.pusic@gmail.com - 2012-04-02 04:25 -0700
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-04-02 22:01 +0000
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2012-04-02 07:37 -0700
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2012-04-03 19:35 +0200
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> - 2012-04-04 11:56 -0700
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.no> - 2012-04-05 14:17 +0800

csiph-web