Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1186
| From | no.top.post@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking, comp.lang.oberon |
| Subject | ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? |
| Date | 2012-03-22 19:28 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jkfuhn$4ho$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
I'm writing this while I'm thinking it through, so I'll have a record. Duke mentioned the problem of email for LNO. I don't like LNO much, compared to LEO, which I use all the time. But LNO can run on a netbook using a framebuffer, without the full X-window system. So let's think this problem through. And correct my mistaken assumptions and conclusions:- N-O was originaly designed for RS232-modem, and the full <IP/TCP stack> was in N-O [of course]. So for <send string1 to IP/port>, all stages/levels, from the app's passing the string, down to the serial port driving the modem, was handled by N-O [of course]. Under LEO, the underlying linux does the internet handling. Without anlysing the source code, I want to know how the N-O part of LEO interfaces with linux. Does the fact that "everything in *nix is a file" make this easy? Since linux, which previously drove a modem via a RS232, can easily be 'reconfigured' to drive a radio-modem via a USB; and passing the same byte-stream in both cases, I'm guessing that just the appropriate file-driver are needed. So the byte-stream is just fed to any character-type file-device, and the appropriate driver handles it. So the input-feeder need not be concerned what is receiving the input. If that is the case, and although the netbook has no actual RS232, if I create a /dev/tty0 [pseudo]file and [symbolicly] link it to the /dev/<existingUSB> , which is connected to the remote IP:port via linux, could I communicate with the remote IP:port via LNO? Would LNO treat the /devtty0/ as if it was a PC's "COM" port? I guess not, since during boot, linux would see that there is NO RS232-port and .....? If not, I suspect that facilities exist to easily connect into the IP:stack at various levels, and connecting at the highest level would be most convenient, via an Oberon <-> C interface ? Thanks for any ideas, == Chris Glur.
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-03-22 19:28 +0000
Re: ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2012-03-22 21:39 +0200
Re: ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-03-22 20:07 +0000
Re: ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2012-03-22 16:27 -0400
Re: ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2012-03-22 16:44 -0400
Re: ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2012-03-23 02:43 +0000
Re: ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2012-03-22 21:12 +0000
Re: ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? "Chris Burrows" <cfbsoftware@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-23 19:10 +1030
Re (2): ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-03-23 23:21 +0000
Re (2+): ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-03-24 05:58 +0000
Re: Re (2+): ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2012-03-24 12:12 +0200
Re (3) ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-03-24 18:24 +0000
Re (2+++): ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-03-24 17:22 +0000
Re: Re (2+++): ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2012-03-25 15:17 +0300
Re: Re (2+++): ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-03-25 12:31 +0000
Re (2+++): ETHO interfacing linux IP:stack? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-03-25 14:26 +0000
csiph-web