Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #14790
| From | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: use of pointers |
| Date | 2012-03-06 20:56 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jj5tm8$faa$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <0ea866f3-d443-4014-93fe-507d76ee6528@em9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <4f560345$0$3087$7b1e8fa0@news.nbl.fi> <jj521m$ih2$1@dont-email.me> <jj55ii$c4e$2@speranza.aioe.org> <jj5dpp$rov$1@dont-email.me> |
Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> wrote: (snip, someone wrote) >>> The name 'Point' is misleading IMNSHO and so is the name of the >>> function. What is returned is a velocity vector, not a position. >> I suppose, but you could just consider it a point in velocity space. > I could. But somebody who will likely assign a velocity "point" to a > two-dimensional spatial (planar) point, shouldn't. There is no "space" > designation in the type, is there? I expect that you will find that some people think one way one some the other. Note that it is unusual (there might be one) for programming languages to keep track of dimensional units. Physics has, in addition to velocity space, which might not seem too strange, momentum space. There are some problems that can easily be solved if you think of them in momentum space. (Even relativistically when it isn't mass times velocity anymore.) >>> And I am not so sure one couldn't just return std::pair<float,float> >>> since it essentially does the same thing, except that its members are >>> not called 'x' and 'y'... Why invent another type when a standard one >>> exists? >> But velocity also has x and y components, so Point is fine. > <sigh> It isn't. But I don't see any use of arguing. Not anymore. > Sorry I brought it up. I have thought for some time now, that it is more usual for physicists to include units in their variables, and for engineers to factor them out. In a physics book you will see F=ma. In an engineering book F(Newtons) = m(kg) * a (m/s**2) In the latter case, the variable holds the unitless value that, when the specified unit is applied, has the appropriate value and dimensions. Now, with a name like Point, one could ask why it is 2D and not 3D, or even 4D. You could name the class Vector2D, though. -- glen
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
use of pointers ahso <ahso47@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-06 02:54 -0800
Re: use of pointers Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2012-03-06 12:22 +0100
Re: use of pointers nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-03-07 00:32 -0800
Re: use of pointers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-03-07 13:47 +0000
Re: use of pointers nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-03-07 07:06 -0800
Re: use of pointers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-03-07 16:04 +0000
Re: use of pointers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-03-06 12:29 +0000
Re: use of pointers Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-03-06 08:04 -0500
Re: use of pointers glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-06 14:05 +0000
Re: use of pointers Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-03-06 11:25 -0500
Re: use of pointers glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-06 20:56 +0000
Re: use of pointers SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2012-03-06 06:27 -0800
Re: use of pointers BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-06 13:05 -0700
Re: use of pointers woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2012-03-07 05:38 -0800
Re: use of pointers Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 15:48 +0000
Re: use of pointers BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-07 18:38 -0700
Re: use of pointers Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2012-03-10 21:10 -0500
Re: use of pointers Jeff Flinn <TriumphSprint2000@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-12 08:26 -0400
Re: use of pointers Jeff Flinn <TriumphSprint2000@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-12 12:28 -0400
Re: use of pointers Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-03-09 21:28 +0000
Re: use of pointers Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-06 21:31 -0800
Re: use of pointers Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-03-07 11:26 +0000
Re: use of pointers yatremblay@bel1lin202.(none) (Yannick Tremblay) - 2012-03-07 13:56 +0000
Re: use of pointers Maarten <maarten.sneep@knmi.nl> - 2012-03-07 06:14 -0800
Re: use of pointers Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 16:05 +0000
Re: use of pointers yatremblay@bel1lin202.(none) (Yannick Tremblay) - 2012-03-08 10:08 +0000
Re: use of pointers Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 21:17 +0000
Re: use of pointers Maarten <maarten.sneep@knmi.nl> - 2012-03-08 04:55 -0800
Re: use of pointers Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-03-09 21:45 +0000
Re: use of pointers Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-03-07 20:08 +0000
Re: use of pointers Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-03-09 21:50 +0000
Re: use of pointers Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-03-09 22:37 +0000
Re: use of pointers Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-03-07 15:37 +0000
csiph-web