Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #14374
| From | "Fred Zwarts \(KVI\)" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: question on no-argument constructor |
| Date | 2012-02-21 14:44 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <ji074n$ppa$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <18415058.42.1329830819543.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbne13> |
"Oliver" wrote in message
news:18415058.42.1329830819543.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbne13...
>
>hi, all -
>
>I have a newbie question: suppose I have a user-defined class that must
>take a argument to properly initialize. so I have something like:
>
>class Foo {
> explicit Foo(const string &str);
>...
>}
>
>Another class define Foo as its member:
>
>class Bar {
>
>private:
> Foo foo;
>}
>
>Now the compiler complains that it can find the candidate constructor. So
>it seems I must define a no-argument constructor for Foo ... at the risk of
>the object can exist without being properly initialized? I must have missed
>something ...
>
>Thanks for your help
>
>Oliver
Initialize foo in the constructor of bar, e.g.:
class Bar {
private:
Foo foo;
explicit Bar (const string &str) : foo (str) {};
}
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
question on no-argument constructor Oliver <fwang2@gmail.com> - 2012-02-21 05:26 -0800
Re: question on no-argument constructor "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-21 14:32 +0100
Re: question on no-argument constructor Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-21 05:44 -0800
Re: question on no-argument constructor "Fred Zwarts \(KVI\)" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl> - 2012-02-21 14:44 +0100
Re: question on no-argument constructor Oliver <fwang2@gmail.com> - 2012-02-21 06:41 -0800
Re: question on no-argument constructor Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-21 08:14 -0800
Re: question on no-argument constructor Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-21 17:00 +0000
Re: question on no-argument constructor Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-21 21:12 +0000
Re: question on no-argument constructor Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2012-02-21 23:44 -0800
csiph-web