Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #16774

Re: Comparing C11 compilers

From Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Comparing C11 compilers
Date 2012-02-06 21:36 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <jgph4o$b3r$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <jgp3oh$8c5$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Quentin Pope wrote:

> I have been searching on Google for reviews and comparisons of available
> C11 compilers, and general information on degree of compliance and likely
> roll out schedules for major vendors as they update their implementations
> in accordance with the new standard.
> 
> However, I've found very little information on this topic!
> 
> Which C11 compilers are people here using? Have you had any problems with
> the new features? Does anyone have information on vendors' plans (esp gcc,
> Intel)?

I am not aware of any comparisons other than the ones which are displayed in 
each compiler's site.  

It would be nice if there was an objective review on this issue.  Maybe it 
is possible to put together a C11 compliance test and then host the results 
somewhere, such as a wiki from wikia.  

At this moment I'm not able to do this, and I'm affraid it would take a bit 
of time and work to do it right.  Is anyone interested in contributing to 
this?


Rui Maciel

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Comparing C11 compilers Quentin Pope <qp19433@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2012-02-06 17:48 +0000
  Re: Comparing C11 compilers Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-02-06 09:50 -0800
  Re: Comparing C11 compilers bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-02-06 20:29 +0100
    Re: Comparing C11 compilers Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-06 11:59 -0800
      Re: Comparing C11 compilers bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-02-08 16:29 +0100
  Re: Comparing C11 compilers Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 21:36 +0000

csiph-web