Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Comparing C11 compilers |
| Date | 2012-02-06 21:36 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jgph4o$b3r$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jgp3oh$8c5$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Quentin Pope wrote: > I have been searching on Google for reviews and comparisons of available > C11 compilers, and general information on degree of compliance and likely > roll out schedules for major vendors as they update their implementations > in accordance with the new standard. > > However, I've found very little information on this topic! > > Which C11 compilers are people here using? Have you had any problems with > the new features? Does anyone have information on vendors' plans (esp gcc, > Intel)? I am not aware of any comparisons other than the ones which are displayed in each compiler's site. It would be nice if there was an objective review on this issue. Maybe it is possible to put together a C11 compliance test and then host the results somewhere, such as a wiki from wikia. At this moment I'm not able to do this, and I'm affraid it would take a bit of time and work to do it right. Is anyone interested in contributing to this? Rui Maciel
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Comparing C11 compilers Quentin Pope <qp19433@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2012-02-06 17:48 +0000
Re: Comparing C11 compilers Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-02-06 09:50 -0800
Re: Comparing C11 compilers bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-02-06 20:29 +0100
Re: Comparing C11 compilers Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-06 11:59 -0800
Re: Comparing C11 compilers bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-02-08 16:29 +0100
Re: Comparing C11 compilers Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 21:36 +0000
csiph-web